Suppr超能文献

一项关于曾患妊娠期糖尿病的拉丁裔女性避孕方法与血脂及血压关系的纵向研究。

A longitudinal study of lipids and blood pressure in relation to method of contraception in Latino women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Xiang Anny H, Kawakubo Miwa, Buchanan Thomas A, Kjos Siri L

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, 1540 Alcazar St., CHP-222, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2007 Aug;30(8):1952-8. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0180. Epub 2007 May 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of nonhormonal contraception (NHC), combination oral contraception (COC), and depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on lipids and blood pressure in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

An observational cohort of 972 nondiabetic, normotensive, postpartum Latino women who elected NHC (n = 448), COC (n = 430), or DMPA (n = 94) were followed for at least one subsequent metabolic evaluation on the same contraception. Baseline and follow-up measures included glucose tolerance testing, fasting serum LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. Patterns of changes in lipids and blood pressure were evaluated by comparing slopes over follow-up time using random coefficient linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Median follow-up times were 20, 12, and 11 months in the NHC, COC, and DMPA groups. The DMPA users gained significantly more weight (4.3 +/- 6.9 kg/year) compared with NHC and COC users (1.2 +/- 4.7 and 0.7 +/- 6.0 kg/year, respectively; P < 0.0001). Patterns of change in LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and DBP were not significantly different among groups. HDL cholesterol change differed only between COC and NHC groups (adjusted slopes: 1.0 vs. -1.6 mg x dl(-1) x year(-1), respectively; P < 0.0001). SBP change differed only between COC and DMPA groups (adjusted slopes: 1.3 vs. -1.7 mmHg/year, respectively; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These results, derived predominantly from the initial 1-2 years of treatment in Hispanic women, demonstrate that DMPA was associated with greater weight gain than NHCs or COCs. Other differences in blood pressure and lipid effects were very small. These findings should be taken into account when advising women with recent GDM about their contraceptive choices.

摘要

目的

研究非激素避孕(NHC)、复方口服避孕药(COC)和醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)对近期患有妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的女性血脂和血压的影响。

研究设计与方法

对972名非糖尿病、血压正常的产后拉丁裔女性进行观察性队列研究,她们选择了NHC(n = 448)、COC(n = 430)或DMPA(n = 94),并在使用相同避孕方法的情况下至少进行了一次后续代谢评估。基线和随访测量包括葡萄糖耐量试验、空腹血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇、甘油三酯以及收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。使用随机系数线性混合效应模型比较随访期间的斜率,评估血脂和血压的变化模式。

结果

NHC、COC和DMPA组的中位随访时间分别为20、12和11个月。与NHC和COC使用者(分别为1.2±4.7和0.7±6.0 kg/年)相比,DMPA使用者体重增加明显更多(4.3±6.9 kg/年;P < 0.0001)。各组之间LDL胆固醇、甘油三酯和DBP的变化模式没有显著差异。HDL胆固醇变化仅在COC组和NHC组之间有所不同(调整斜率分别为1.0与 -1.6 mg·dl⁻¹·年⁻¹;P < 0.0001)。SBP变化仅在COC组和DMPA组之间有所不同(调整斜率分别为1.3与 -1.7 mmHg/年;P = 0.01)。

结论

这些结果主要来自西班牙裔女性治疗的最初1 - 2年,表明DMPA与比NHC或COC更大的体重增加有关。血压和血脂影响的其他差异非常小。在为近期患有GDM的女性提供避孕选择建议时,应考虑这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验