Wester Petra, Classen-Bockhoff Regine
Institut für Spezielle Botanik und Botanischer Garten, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, D-55099 Mainz, Germany.
Ann Bot. 2007 Aug;100(2):401-21. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm036. Epub 2007 May 22.
Bird-pollinated (ornithophilous) Salvia species (sages) transfer pollen either by means of a staminal lever mechanism or by immovable stamens. As the distribution of the two modes within the genus is not known, we present a survey of all ornithophilous sages. The main focus is given to floral diversity especially with respect to functional lever morphology. Thereby the hypothesis is tested that, due to a pollinator shift from bees to birds, the lever mechanism became unnecessary.
To get a general idea about the diversity of pollen transfer mechanisms, 186 ornithophilous Salvia species were classified according to the functional morphology of the stamen and the need for a lever movement. To test the functionality of the staminal levers and the fitting between flowers and birds the process of pollen transfer was examined by pollinator observations and tested by inserting museum skins and metal rods into fresh flowers.
The diversity of pollen transfer mechanisms is represented by eight case studies illustrating three main groups. In group I (approx. 50 %) the staminal lever mechanism is necessary to open access to nectar and to enable the transfer of pollen that is hidden in the upper lip. In group II (approx. 34 %) pollen is freely accessible and the lever mechanism is reduced in different ways and to different degrees. In group III (approx. 4 %) the lever works as in group I, but pollen is freely accessible as in II. The remaining approx. 13 % are not clearly classified.
It is considered that the driving force behind the diverse modes of reduction is the necessity to increase the distance between nectar and pollen, thereby ensuring pollen deposition on the bird's feathered head. This is achieved several times in parallel by corolla elongation and/or exposure of the pollen-sacs. As soon as pollen is freely accessible, the lever movement loses its significance for pollination.
鸟媒传粉的鼠尾草属植物通过雄蕊杠杆机制或固定雄蕊来传递花粉。由于该属内这两种传粉方式的分布情况尚不清楚,我们对所有鸟媒传粉的鼠尾草进行了调查。主要关注花的多样性,特别是功能杠杆形态。由此检验了这样一个假设:由于传粉者从蜜蜂转变为鸟类,杠杆机制变得不再必要。
为了大致了解花粉传递机制的多样性,根据雄蕊的功能形态和杠杆运动的需求,对186种鸟媒传粉的鼠尾草进行了分类。为了测试雄蕊杠杆的功能以及花与鸟类之间的适配性,通过观察传粉者对花粉传递过程进行了研究,并通过将博物馆标本皮和金属棒插入鲜花中进行了测试。
花粉传递机制的多样性通过八个案例研究得以体现,这些案例研究说明了三个主要类别。在第一组(约50%)中,雄蕊杠杆机制对于打开获取花蜜的通道以及使隐藏在上唇中的花粉得以传递是必要的。在第二组(约34%)中,花粉可自由获取,杠杆机制以不同方式和不同程度退化。在第三组(约4%)中,杠杆的作用与第一组相同,但花粉像在第二组中一样可自由获取。其余约13%未明确分类。
据认为,多种退化模式背后的驱动力是增加花蜜与花粉之间距离的必要性,从而确保花粉沉积在鸟类有羽毛的头部。这通过花冠伸长和/或花粉囊暴露多次并行实现。一旦花粉可自由获取,杠杆运动对传粉就失去了意义。