Hiller Matthew L, Leukefeld Carl G, Garrity Thomas F, Godlaski Theodore, Schoeneberger Marlies, Townsend Michael, Hascal Karyn
Temple University, Department of Criminal Justice, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007 Mar;39(1):59-68. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2007.10399865.
Several national evaluations have been conducted since the late 1960s that have assessed the effectiveness of publicly-funded substance abuse treatment in the United States. These studies, however, have focused principally on urban-based treatment programs, and it is unclear whether findings from urban programs can be replicated in outcome studies of programs in rural areas. The current study, therefore, examined the treatment outcomes of clients admitted to one of several short-term inpatient or outpatient drug-free treatment agencies in rural Kentucky. Findings showed that treatment was associated with reductions in drug use and criminality during a six-month follow-up interval. Employment status also improved significantly, and health services utilization was reduced. The similarity between the current findings and findings from national outcome studies of urban-based treatment programs is discussed.
自20世纪60年代末以来,美国进行了几次全国性评估,以评估公共资助的药物滥用治疗的有效性。然而,这些研究主要集中在城市治疗项目上,尚不清楚城市项目的研究结果是否能在农村地区项目的结果研究中得到复制。因此,当前的研究考察了肯塔基州农村地区几家短期住院或门诊戒毒治疗机构之一收治的患者的治疗结果。研究结果表明,在为期六个月的随访期间,治疗与药物使用减少和犯罪行为减少相关。就业状况也显著改善,医疗服务利用率降低。本文还讨论了当前研究结果与城市治疗项目全国性结果研究结果之间的相似性。