Medicina Interna III, Ospedale ‘L. Sacco’, Milano, Italy.
Clin Drug Investig. 2005;25(3):175-82. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200525030-00003.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been proposed as first-choice drugs for antihypertensive therapy in elderly subjects because of their demonstrated efficacy and safety. However, no information is currently available on the use of zofenopril in elderly hypertensive patients.
To assess the efficacy and safety of zofenopril (30 or 60mg once daily) compared with lisinopril (10 or 20mg once daily).
Patients aged >/=65 years with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >/=90mm Hg and </=110mm Hg) were included in the study. They were randomised to receive either zofenopril 30mg or lisinopril 10mg. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. Patients underwent electrocardiography and evaluation of laboratory parameters at baseline and after 12 weeks. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was also performed at baseline and after 12 weeks. After 4 weeks drug doses were doubled in patients whose sitting DBP was >/=90mm Hg. The primary endpoint was to achieve sitting DBP values <90mm Hg or a reduction of sitting DBP >10mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment.
181 patients were randomised to treatment and 164 patients completed the study. Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. The percentage of patients with normalised sitting DBP (<90mm Hg) and the rate of treatment responders (reduction of sitting DBP >/=10mm Hg) were not significantly different between the two treatment groups (normalised: zofenopril 81.3% vs lisinopril 76.7%; responders: zofenopril 74.7% vs lisinopril 77.8%). At the end of the treatment sitting DBP was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (zofenopril 82.2 +/- 6.6mm Hg vs lisinopril 82.0 +/- 7.8mm Hg). Eight percent of patients experienced adverse events in the zofenopril group and 9% in the lisinopril group. A small percentage of adverse events (4%) was related to treatment and reported in the zofenopril group.
In elderly hypertensive patients, treatment with zofenopril was effective and well tolerated. Efficacy and safety were comparable with those of lisinopril.
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)由于其疗效和安全性,已被提议作为老年患者抗高血压治疗的首选药物。然而,目前尚无关于老年高血压患者使用佐芬普利的信息。
评估佐芬普利(30 或 60mg 每日 1 次)与赖诺普利(10 或 20mg 每日 1 次)相比的疗效和安全性。
研究纳入年龄≥65 岁、患有轻至中度原发性高血压(坐位舒张压[DBP]≥90mmHg 且≤110mmHg)的患者。他们被随机分配接受佐芬普利 30mg 或赖诺普利 10mg。在治疗开始时和 4 周和 12 周后测量血压和心率。在基线和 12 周后进行心电图和实验室参数评估。在基线和 12 周后还进行了动态血压监测(ABPM)。在坐位 DBP≥90mmHg 的患者中,在 4 周后将药物剂量加倍。主要终点是在 12 周治疗后达到坐位 DBP 值<90mmHg 或坐位 DBP 降低>10mmHg。
181 例患者被随机分配至治疗组,164 例患者完成了研究。33 例患者纳入 24 小时血压监测分析。两组患者坐位 DBP 正常(<90mmHg)的患者比例和治疗应答者(坐位 DBP 降低≥10mmHg)的发生率无显著差异(正常化:佐芬普利 81.3%比赖诺普利 76.7%;应答者:佐芬普利 74.7%比赖诺普利 77.8%)。治疗结束时,两组患者坐位 DBP 无显著差异(佐芬普利 82.2±6.6mmHg 比赖诺普利 82.0±7.8mmHg)。佐芬普利组有 8%的患者发生不良反应,赖诺普利组有 9%的患者发生不良反应。佐芬普利组有一小部分不良反应(4%)与治疗相关并报告。
在老年高血压患者中,佐芬普利治疗有效且耐受良好。疗效和安全性与赖诺普利相当。