Nicholson Adam, Lee Courtney, Ugarte Roland, Best Sara, Monga Manoj
Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455-0392, USA.
J Endourol. 2007 May;21(5):494-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0310.
To evaluate the efficacy of three lithotripter configurations that utilize the Medstone STS treatment head.
From 1999 through 2002, 13,131 patients were treated with the Medstone STS fixedsite unit (STS-FIX; 52%), the mobile coach-transportable unit (STS-MOB; 26%), or the modular operating-room unit (STS-T; 22%). All units were staffed by a rotating schedule of the same ten SWL-certified radiological technicians. The treating urologists reported follow-up that included plain abdominal radiography to document stone-free rate (no residual fragments) and the need for auxiliary procedures or re-treatment. An efficiency quotient (EQ) was calculated for each unit.
The overall stone-free rate for the STS-FIX, STS-MOB, and the STS-T was 59%, 62%, and 65%, respectively. The STS-FIX had the lowest stone-free rate for lower-pole stones (48%) and stones 21 mm to 30 mm (30%) compared with the STS-MOB (57% and 62%, respectively) and the STS-T (59% and 54%, respectively). However, the STS-FIX had a higher stone-free rate in the middle ureter (86%) than the STS-T (67%) and STS-MOB (65%). The STS-FIX required more post-SWL procedures overall (12%) than the STSMOB (4%) and STS-T (5%). The re-treatment rates for the STS-FIX, STS-MOB, and STS-T were 7%, 6%, and 6%, respectively. The STS-T had the highest overall EQ (59) followed by the STS-MOB (56) and the STSFIX (50).
New configurations of the STS lithotripter have a significant positive impact on efficacy compared with the original fixed machine. Availability of real-time fluoroscopy with the STS-T may impact the higher EQ of this machine.
评估三种使用Medstone STS治疗头的碎石机配置的疗效。
1999年至2002年期间,13131例患者接受了Medstone STS固定位点设备(STS - FIX;52%)、移动教练运输式设备(STS - MOB;26%)或模块化手术室设备(STS - T;22%)的治疗。所有设备均由相同的十名经SWL认证的放射技师按轮流排班提供人员支持。治疗的泌尿外科医生报告了随访情况,包括腹部平片以记录结石清除率(无残留碎片)以及辅助程序或再次治疗的需求。为每个设备计算了效率商(EQ)。
STS - FIX、STS - MOB和STS - T的总体结石清除率分别为59%、62%和65%。与STS - MOB(分别为57%和62%)和STS - T(分别为59%和54%)相比,STS - FIX在下极结石(48%)和21毫米至30毫米结石(30%)方面的结石清除率最低。然而,STS - FIX在输尿管中段的结石清除率(86%)高于STS - T(67%)和STS - MOB(65%)。总体而言,STS - FIX在冲击波碎石术后需要更多的后续程序(12%),高于STS - MOB(4%)和STS - T(5%)。STS - FIX、STS - MOB和STS - T的再次治疗率分别为7%、6%和6%。STS - T的总体EQ最高(59),其次是STS - MOB(56)和STS - FIX(50)。
与原始固定机器相比,STS碎石机的新配置对疗效有显著的积极影响。STS - T配备实时荧光透视功能可能是该设备EQ较高的原因。