• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第一代(多尼尔HM3)和第二代(美杜莎STS)碎石机的比较:145例儿童肾及输尿管结石的治疗结果

Comparison of first-generation (Dornier HM3) and second-generation (Medstone STS) lithotripters: treatment results with 145 renal and ureteral calculi in children.

作者信息

Cass A S

机构信息

Midwest Urologic Stone Unit, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1996 Dec;10(6):493-9. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.493.

DOI:10.1089/end.1996.10.493
PMID:8972780
Abstract

The treatment results obtained in children using an unmodified Dornier HM3 or a Medstone STS lithotripter for renal and ureteral stones were compared. The Dornier HM3 was used to treat 28 renal and 10 ureteral stones, while the Medstone STS was used to treat 73 renal and 34 ureteral stones. The treatment results were compared using the chi-square test to determine statistical significance. The stone-free rate, retreatment rate, and post-SWL secondary-procedure rate were 68%, 4%, and 0, respectively, with the Dornier HM3 and 93%, 6%, and 3.6%, respectively, with the Medstone STS for single renal stones and 80%, 0, and 0, respectively, with the Dornier HM3 and 82%, 0, and 5.9%, respectively, with the Medstone STS for single ureteral stones. Abnormal anatomy (horseshoe kidney, allograft kidney) or functional interference with the passage of fragments (urinary diversion, neurogenic bladder) was present in 16% of the children treated with the Dornier HM3 compared with 5% of those treated with the Medstone STS (p = 0.36). The treatment results with the unmodified Dornier HM3 and the Medstone STS were similar except for the statistically significantly higher stone-free rate for single renal stones obtained with the Medstone STS. The difference was most likely attributable to the smaller number of children with abnormal anatomy or functional interference with the passage of fragments who were treated with the Medstone.

摘要

比较了使用未改良的多尼尔HM3或Medstone STS碎石机治疗儿童肾和输尿管结石的治疗结果。多尼尔HM3用于治疗28例肾结石和10例输尿管结石,而Medstone STS用于治疗73例肾结石和34例输尿管结石。使用卡方检验比较治疗结果以确定统计学意义。对于单个肾结石,使用多尼尔HM3时的无石率、再次治疗率和体外冲击波碎石术后二次手术率分别为68%、4%和0,使用Medstone STS时分别为93%、6%和3.6%;对于单个输尿管结石,使用多尼尔HM3时分别为80%、0和0,使用Medstone STS时分别为82%、0和5.9%。接受多尼尔HM3治疗的儿童中有16%存在解剖异常(马蹄肾、同种异体肾)或对碎片通过的功能干扰(尿流改道、神经源性膀胱),而接受Medstone STS治疗的儿童中这一比例为5%(p = 0.36)。除了Medstone STS治疗单个肾结石的无石率在统计学上显著更高外,未改良的多尼尔HM3和Medstone STS的治疗结果相似。这种差异很可能归因于接受Medstone治疗的存在解剖异常或对碎片通过有功能干扰的儿童数量较少。

相似文献

1
Comparison of first-generation (Dornier HM3) and second-generation (Medstone STS) lithotripters: treatment results with 145 renal and ureteral calculi in children.第一代(多尼尔HM3)和第二代(美杜莎STS)碎石机的比较:145例儿童肾及输尿管结石的治疗结果
J Endourol. 1996 Dec;10(6):493-9. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.493.
2
Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi.第一代(多尼尔HM3)和第二代(美多斯STS)碎石机的比较:13864例肾和输尿管结石的治疗结果
J Urol. 1995 Mar;153(3 Pt 1):588-92. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199503000-00006.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi.
J Urol. 1992 Jun;147(6):1495-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37606-1.
4
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for stones in middle third of ureter (overlying pelvic bone).
Urology. 1994 Feb;43(2):182-5; discussion 185-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90041-8.
5
[Extracorporeal lithotripsy using the HM3 Dornier lithotriptor and the modified HM3 lithotriptor].使用HM3多尼尔碎石机和改良型HM3碎石机的体外冲击波碎石术
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl. 1989 Dec;61(4):367-72.
6
[Second generation shock wave lithotripsy: experience with the Siemens Lithostar].第二代冲击波碎石术:西门子Lithostar的应用经验
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Dec;35(12):2099-105.
7
Radiation awareness program for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy using Medstone lithotripters.
J Endourol. 1998 Jun;12(3):223-7. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.223.
8
Wolf Piezolith 2200 versus the modified Dornier HM3. Efficacy and range of indications.
Eur Urol. 1989;16(1):1-6. doi: 10.1159/000471518.
9
[Treatment of ureteral calculi with extracorporeal lithotripsy. Comparison between the original Dornier HM3 and the modified lithotriptor].
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl. 1991 Mar;63(1):71-5.
10
[Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].[冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石——单机构661例连续病例经验]
Harefuah. 2005 Sep;144(9):605-8, 680, 679.

引用本文的文献

1
SWL for pediatric population.针对儿童群体的体外冲击波碎石术
World J Urol. 2024 Nov 12;42(1):637. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05249-x.
2
Contemporary minimal invasive surgical management of stones in children.当代儿童结石的微创外科治疗
Asian J Urol. 2023 Jul;10(3):239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
3
Semirigid Ureteroscopy Therapy against Childhood Kidney Stones.半硬性输尿管镜治疗儿童肾结石
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Aug 8;2022:7771920. doi: 10.1155/2022/7771920. eCollection 2022.
4
Ureteroscopy in infants and preschool age children: technique and preliminary results.婴儿和学龄前儿童的输尿管镜检查:技术与初步结果
Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(1):30-2. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.01.art9. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
5
Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in children.体外冲击波碎石术治疗儿童输尿管结石的疗效
Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Dec;25(12):1109-12. doi: 10.1007/s00383-009-2489-5. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
6
Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?体外冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管结石。从文献中我们能了解到哪些关于治疗结果和治疗方法的信息?
Urol Res. 2005 Jun;33(3):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0462-x. Epub 2005 May 29.
7
Treatment update on pediatric urolithiasis.小儿尿石症的治疗进展
World J Urol. 1997;15(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/BF02201857.