Hunter Billie, Segrott Jeremy
School of Health Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):608-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 23.
To explore the growing use of clinical pathways by nurses and midwives, their impact on client care, and the potential consequences of widespread pathway utilisation for the professional identity and knowledge base of nursing and midwifery.
A keyword search was performed within CINAHL and PubMed for the period 1995-2006 to identify relevant material, and article bibliographies were examined to identify relevance references. Thirty-nine publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis on the basis that they offered the most original account of the development of pathways or their effectiveness, or because they provided useful theoretical concepts. A thematic analysis of the selected articles was undertaken.
The review identified four main themes: the multiple aims of clinical pathways; the process of initial development; pathway implementation in practice, and the impacts of pathways on client care, professional identities, and the nature of written documentation. Clinical pathways have multiple aims, including standardising practice, levering external evidence into local health care work, and improving interprofessional co-ordination. The review found limited evidence of pathways' impact on client care, but the existing research suggests that they may be most suitable for predictable, routinised surgical procedures. Key concepts, such as variance and audit were found to be poorly defined. Clinical pathways appear to achieve many of their effects at the development stage and the reshaping of professional interactions.
Given their widespread adoption and valorisation as tools of evidence-based practice, the dearth of evidence for clinical pathways should raise concerns. Clinical pathways may have significant impacts on nursing and midwifery as professions, both through redrawing professional identities and boundaries, and transforming the ways in which nurses and midwives document care. The impact of standardised pathways on professional ideologies which emphasise individualised care, and clinical autonomy will require long-term programmes of research.
探讨护士和助产士对临床路径的使用日益增加的情况、其对客户护理的影响,以及广泛使用临床路径对护理和助产专业身份及知识基础的潜在后果。
在1995年至2006年期间,在CINAHL和PubMed中进行关键词搜索,以识别相关材料,并检查文章参考文献以确定相关参考资料。基于这些出版物对路径发展或其有效性提供了最原始的描述,或者因为它们提供了有用的理论概念,选择了39篇出版物纳入分析。对所选文章进行了主题分析。
该综述确定了四个主要主题:临床路径的多重目标;初始开发过程;实践中的路径实施,以及路径对客户护理、专业身份和书面文件性质的影响。临床路径有多重目标,包括规范实践、将外部证据引入当地医疗保健工作以及改善跨专业协作。该综述发现路径对客户护理影响的证据有限,但现有研究表明它们可能最适用于可预测的常规外科手术。发现诸如变异和审核等关键概念定义不明确。临床路径似乎在开发阶段以及重塑专业互动方面实现了许多效果。
鉴于临床路径作为循证实践工具被广泛采用和推崇,其证据的匮乏应引起关注。临床路径可能会对护理和助产专业产生重大影响,既通过重塑专业身份和界限,也通过改变护士和助产士记录护理的方式。标准化路径对强调个性化护理和临床自主性的专业理念的影响将需要长期的研究计划。