Suppr超能文献

用于极端远视白内障手术的人工晶状体的生物测量与公式准确性

Biometry and formula accuracy with intraocular lenses used for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia.

作者信息

MacLaren Robert E, Natkunarajah Mythili, Riaz Yasmin, Bourne Rupert R A, Restori Marie, Allan Bruce D S

机构信息

Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;143(6):920-931. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D).

METHODS

Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula.

RESULTS

In practice, 55% of patients were within +/-1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 +/- 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (-0.70 +/- 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (-1.11 +/- 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (-1.45 +/- 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia.

摘要

目的

审核极端远视白内障手术的人工晶状体(IOL)屈光度预测,并比较不同生物测量公式和IOL类型的准确性。

设计

对56例接受白内障手术患者的76只眼进行回顾性分析,所使用IOL的屈光度范围为30至35屈光度(D)。

方法

采用超声或光学方法测量眼轴长度、角膜屈光力和前房深度,并使用IOLMaster(美国加利福尼亚州都柏林市卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司)软件预测每种使用的IOL的屈光结果。然后分析每个公式预测的和实际术后屈光之间的差异。

结果

在实际中,55%的患者术后屈光在其手术医生预测值的±1.0 D范围内。理论上,Haigis公式的平均屈光误差最小(+0.51±0.12 D),其次是Hoffer Q公式(-0.70±0.14 D)、Holladay 1公式(-1.11±0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验