Thurn J R, Belongia E A, Crossley K
Department of Medicine, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center, MN.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Nov;39(11):1105-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb02877.x.
To assess the experience of Minnesota nursing homes with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and the policies and procedures used for its control.
A 12-question survey, with primarily categorical responses, was mailed to the Directors of Nursing of all Minnesota long-term-care facilities. A follow-up mailing was sent to non-responders 5 weeks later. The mailing included a cover letter, a description of the study and its purposes, and a stamped return envelope. Four weeks after the second mailing, all non-responding institutions were contacted by telephone and invited to participated by mail or by completing the survey by telephone.
All long-term-care facilities in Minnesota licensed for skilled and intermediate care.
The survey was directed to the Directors of Nursing of the long-term-care facilities with the request that, if another individual was better able to complete it, the survey be forwarded to them.
Completed responses were obtained from 88% (395/445) of all long-term-care facilities in Minnesota. Forty-eight institutions (12%) had residents colonized or infected with MRSA. Only four (8%) of these facilities stated that MRSA was a problem; however, 33 (69%) of facilities with MRSA had sought outside help or consultation from a variety of sources for its control. Few facilities (7%) had cultured residents specifically for MRSA. Policies regarding the admission of colonized or infected persons were reported by 14% and 21% of facilities, respectively, and over 40% of these policies stated that persons with MRSA would not be accepted. Policies regarding the care of MRSA-colonized or -infected persons were not uniform. Both metropolitan and non-metropolitan facilities had residents with MRSA.
Our results suggest that MRSA in long-term-care facilities may be a widespread and underrecognized problem. There is a need to develop uniform policies for the control of MRSA in nursing homes. These policies should consider the sources and objectives of long-term-care facilities.
评估明尼苏达州疗养院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染情况以及用于控制该病菌的政策和程序。
向明尼苏达州所有长期护理机构的护理主任邮寄一份包含12个问题、主要为分类回答的调查问卷。5周后,向未回复者再次邮寄问卷。邮件包括一封附信、研究及其目的的说明,以及一个贴好邮票的回邮信封。第二次邮寄四周后,通过电话联系所有未回复的机构,邀请它们通过邮寄或电话完成调查。
明尼苏达州所有获得专业和中级护理许可的长期护理机构。
调查问卷针对长期护理机构的护理主任,并要求若有其他人更适合完成问卷,可将问卷转交给他们。
明尼苏达州所有长期护理机构中有88%(395/445)回复了问卷。48家机构(12%)有居民被MRSA定植或感染。这些机构中只有4家(8%)表示MRSA是个问题;然而,33家(69%)有MRSA感染的机构曾从各种渠道寻求外部帮助或咨询以控制感染。很少有机构(7%)专门对居民进行MRSA培养。分别有14%和21%的机构报告了关于收治定植或感染人员的政策,其中超过40%的政策规定不接受感染MRSA的人员。关于护理MRSA定植或感染人员的政策并不统一。大城市和非大城市的机构都有感染MRSA的居民。
我们的结果表明,长期护理机构中的MRSA感染可能是一个普遍存在但未得到充分认识的问题。有必要制定统一的疗养院MRSA控制政策。这些政策应考虑长期护理机构的来源和目标。