Bradley S F
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Drugs Aging. 1997 Mar;10(3):185-98. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199710030-00003.
Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly persons in the community, hospitals and chronic care facilities. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has become an important cause of severe infection in acutely ill patients in hospitals from diverse geographic areas. Whether MRSA has the same potential to spread and cause infection in nursing homes has only recently been explored. In the facilities studied, asymptomatic MRSA carriage has been common, but patients do not appear to have the same risk of acquiring the organism. The risk of MRSA colonisation appears to be associated with increasing debility, the presence of invasive devices or wounds, and increased overall mortality. Most nursing home residents acquire MRSA during a hospital stay, not in the nursing home. Transmission of MRSA between nursing home residents may be less efficient than that seen among hospitalised patients. Once residents acquire MRSA, they remain persistently colonised for months to years. Many different MRSA strains circulate within nursing homes, probably reflecting the strains found in referring hospitals. Fortunately, although MRSA colonisation is relatively common, rates of MRSA infection and attributable mortality appear to be low. However, the presence of MRSA in a facility might lead to fewer treatment options when infections do occur, with more adverse effects and increased costs. The routine use of surveillance cultures and antibacterials in an attempt to permanently eradicate MRSA from nursing home residents has not been successful, and resistance has quickly emerged. More importantly, nursing homes should utilise infection control practices that disrupt transmission by direct contact, thus preventing the potential spread of MRSA. Simple, inexpensive precautions, which emphasise handwashing and the use of gloves and gowns when soiling by patient body fluids is likely, are generally effective. Knowledge of the patient's MRSA colonisation status is not necessary when these universal barrier precautions are applied to the care of all patients. If an increase in the rate of MRSA infections is documented, more intensive infection control measures should be implemented.
金黄色葡萄球菌引起的感染是社区、医院及长期护理机构中老年人发病和死亡的重要原因。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)已成为不同地理区域医院中急性病患者严重感染的重要原因。MRSA在疗养院中传播并导致感染的可能性直到最近才得到研究。在所研究的机构中,无症状MRSA携带很常见,但患者感染该病菌的风险似乎不同。MRSA定植风险似乎与身体日益虚弱、存在侵入性设备或伤口以及总体死亡率增加有关。大多数疗养院居民是在住院期间而非在疗养院感染MRSA的。MRSA在疗养院居民之间的传播效率可能低于住院患者之间的传播效率。居民一旦感染MRSA,就会持续定植数月至数年。许多不同的MRSA菌株在疗养院中传播,这可能反映了转诊医院中发现的菌株情况。幸运的是,尽管MRSA定植相对常见,但MRSA感染率和归因死亡率似乎较低。然而,疗养院中存在MRSA可能会导致感染发生时治疗选择减少,产生更多不良反应并增加成本。试图通过监测培养和使用抗菌药物来永久清除疗养院居民体内MRSA的常规做法并未成功,而且很快就出现了耐药性。更重要的是,疗养院应采用能通过直接接触阻断传播的感染控制措施,从而防止MRSA的潜在传播。简单、低成本的预防措施,如强调洗手以及在可能被患者体液污染时使用手套和隔离衣,通常是有效的。对所有患者进行护理时采用这些通用的屏障预防措施,无需了解患者的MRSA定植状况。如果记录到MRSA感染率上升,应实施更严格的感染控制措施。