van den Hout Wilbert B, de Buck Petronella D M, Vliet Vlieland Theodora P M
Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jun 15;57(5):778-86. doi: 10.1002/art.22786.
To estimate from a societal perspective the cost-utility of a multidisciplinary job retention vocational rehabilitation program compared with usual care in patients with chronic rheumatic diseases at risk of job loss.
Patients (n = 121) were randomly assigned to either the vocational rehabilitation program or usual outpatient care initiated by the treating rheumatologist. Followup lasted for 2 years. Program costs were estimated using time registrations and other societal costs using quarterly cost questionnaires filled out by the patients. To estimate quality-adjusted life years, utility was assessed using the EuroQol classification system, EuroQol rating scale, Short Form 6D, and Time Trade-Off.
As part of the vocational rehabilitation program, patients on average had a total of 7.1 consultations and the total time spent by the multidisciplinary team was 12.7 hours per patient. Program costs were estimated at euro1,426, of which approximately 20% were time and travel costs incurred by the patients. No significant differences were found in other health care consumption, productivity, or quality-adjusted life years. Program costs were outweighed by total savings on other health care and nonhealth care costs, but not significantly.
From a societal perspective, it remains unclear whether the program reduces or increases total costs. Further research on effective vocational rehabilitation is warranted, with special attention to early detection of work problems and the collaboration between health care and vocational rehabilitation services.
从社会角度评估多学科工作保留职业康复计划相较于针对有失业风险的慢性风湿性疾病患者的常规护理的成本效益。
将121名患者随机分为职业康复计划组或由治疗风湿病专家发起的常规门诊护理组。随访持续2年。使用时间登记来估算计划成本,使用患者填写的季度成本问卷来估算其他社会成本。为了估算质量调整生命年,使用欧洲五维度健康量表分类系统、欧洲五维度健康量表评分量表、简式6D量表和时间权衡法来评估效用。
作为职业康复计划的一部分,患者平均共接受7.1次会诊,多学科团队每位患者花费的总时间为12.7小时。计划成本估计为1426欧元,其中约20%是患者产生的时间和交通成本。在其他医疗保健消费、生产力或质量调整生命年方面未发现显著差异。计划成本被其他医疗保健和非医疗保健成本的总节省所抵消,但不显著。
从社会角度来看,尚不清楚该计划是降低还是增加了总成本。有必要对有效的职业康复进行进一步研究,特别关注工作问题的早期发现以及医疗保健与职业康复服务之间的合作。