• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水疗治疗纤维肌痛的成本效益:一般健康状况的改善并非免费。

Cost-effectiveness of Spa treatment for fibromyalgia: general health improvement is not for free.

作者信息

Zijlstra T R, Braakman-Jansen L M A, Taal E, Rasker J J, van de Laar M A F J

机构信息

1Medisch Spectrum Twente Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Sep;46(9):1454-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem157. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/kem157
PMID:17636181
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of an adjuvant treatment course of spa treatment compared with usual care only in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FM).

METHODS

134 patients with FM, selected from a rheumatology outpatient department and from members of the Dutch FM patient association were randomly assigned to a 2(1/2) week spa treatment course in Tunisia or to usual care only. Results are expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a 6-month as well as a 12-month time horizon. Utilities were derived form the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) scores and the visual analogue scale (VAS) rating general health. Costs were reported from societal perspective. Mean incremental cost per patient and the incremental cost utility ratio (ICER) were calculated; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using double-sided bootstrapping.

RESULTS

The data of 128 (55 spa and 73 controls) of the 134 patients (96%) could be used for analysis. Improvement in general health was found in the spa group until 6 months of follow-up by both the SF-6D (AUC 0.32 vs 0.30, P < 0.05) and the VAS (AUC 0.23 vs 0.19, P < 0.01). After 1yr no significant between-group differences were found. Mean incremental cost of spa treatment was 1311 Euro per patient (95% CI 369-2439), equalling the cost of the intervention (thalassotherapy including airfare and lodging), or 885 Euro per patient based on a more realistic cost estimate.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporary improvement in quality of life due to an adjuvant treatment course of spa therapy for patients with FM is associated with limited incremental costs per patient.

摘要

目的

评估与仅接受常规护理相比,水疗辅助治疗疗程对纤维肌痛综合征(FM)患者的成本效益。

方法

从风湿病门诊和荷兰FM患者协会成员中选取134例FM患者,随机分为两组,一组在突尼斯接受为期2(1/2)周的水疗疗程,另一组仅接受常规护理。结果以6个月和12个月时间范围内的质量调整生命年(QALYs)表示。效用值由简式6维健康量表(SF-6D)得分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对总体健康状况的评分得出。成本从社会角度进行报告。计算每位患者的平均增量成本和增量成本效用比(ICER);使用双侧自举法估计95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

134例患者中的128例(55例水疗组和73例对照组,96%)的数据可用于分析。在随访6个月时,水疗组的总体健康状况有所改善,SF-6D(AUC 0.32对0.30,P < 0.05)和VAS(AUC 0.23对0.19,P < 0.01)均显示如此。1年后,两组之间未发现显著差异。水疗治疗的平均增量成本为每位患者1311欧元(95% CI 369 -  2439),等同于干预成本(海水浴疗法,包括机票和住宿),或基于更实际成本估计的每位患者885欧元。

结论

FM患者接受水疗辅助治疗疗程后生活质量的暂时改善与每位患者有限的增量成本相关。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Spa treatment for fibromyalgia: general health improvement is not for free.水疗治疗纤维肌痛的成本效益:一般健康状况的改善并非免费。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Sep;46(9):1454-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem157. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
2
Cost effectiveness of combined spa-exercise therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized controlled trial.联合水疗-运动疗法治疗强直性脊柱炎的成本效益:一项随机对照试验
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Oct 15;47(5):459-67. doi: 10.1002/art.10658.
3
Cost-effectiveness of intensive exercise therapy directly following hospital discharge in patients with arthritis: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.关节炎患者出院后立即进行强化运动疗法的成本效益:一项随机对照临床试验的结果
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Feb 15;59(2):247-54. doi: 10.1002/art.23332.
4
Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses of a long-term, high-intensity exercise program compared with conventional physical therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿性关节炎患者长期高强度运动计划与传统物理治疗的成本效用和成本效益分析。
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb 15;53(1):39-47. doi: 10.1002/art.20903.
5
Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?社区或患者对心脏康复成本效益的偏好:这重要吗?
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):608-15. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328304fec1.
6
Spa treatment for primary fibromyalgia syndrome: a combination of thalassotherapy, exercise and patient education improves symptoms and quality of life.温泉疗法治疗原发性纤维肌痛综合征:海水浴疗法、运动和患者教育相结合可改善症状和生活质量。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Apr;44(4):539-46. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh537. Epub 2005 Feb 3.
7
Cognitive-educational treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized clinical trial. II. Economic evaluation.
J Rheumatol. 1996 Jul;23(7):1246-54.
8
Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis in The Netherlands.荷兰多发性硬化症的成本与生活质量。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;7 Suppl 2:S55-64. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0378-6.
9
The incremental cost effectiveness of in-patient versus out-patient rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty - results of a pilot investigation.全髋关节置换术后住院康复与门诊康复的增量成本效益——一项初步调查的结果
Eur J Med Res. 2008 Jun 24;13(6):267-74.
10
Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in women and men with allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled study in usual care.针灸治疗过敏性鼻炎的男女患者的成本效益:一项常规护理中的随机对照研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Mar 1;169(5):562-71. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn370. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a Home-Based Exercise Program on Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Fitness in Dementia Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于家庭的运动方案对痴呆症照护者健康相关生活质量和身体适应性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):9319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159319.
2
The economic and social value of spa tourism: The case of balneotherapy in Maresme, Spain.温泉旅游的经济和社会价值:以西班牙马雷姆斯地区的水疗为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 31;17(1):e0262428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262428. eCollection 2022.
3
Cost-Effectiveness and Effects of a Home-Based Exercise Intervention for Female Caregivers of Relatives with Dementia: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
一项针对痴呆症亲属女性照料者的居家锻炼干预措施的成本效益及效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 6;8(1):54. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010054.
4
Cost-Utility of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Fibromyalgia versus a Multicomponent Intervention and Usual Care: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial (EUDAIMON Study).基于正念减压疗法治疗纤维肌痛与多成分干预及常规护理的成本效益:一项为期12个月的随机对照试验(EUDAIMON研究)。
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 20;8(7):1068. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071068.
5
Cost-effectiveness of interventions for medically unexplained symptoms: A systematic review.干预措施治疗医学无法解释症状的成本效益:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 15;13(10):e0205278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205278. eCollection 2018.
6
Describing the characteristics, treatment pathways, outcomes, and costs of people with persistent noncancer pain managed by community pain clinics and generating an indicative estimate of cost-effectiveness: feasibility study protocol.描述由社区疼痛诊所管理的持续性非癌性疼痛患者的特征、治疗途径、结局和成本,并对成本效益进行指示性估计:可行性研究方案
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 18;9:237-45. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S97904. eCollection 2016.
7
Resource utilisation and direct costs in patients with recently diagnosed fibromyalgia who are offered one of three different interventions in a randomised pragmatic trial.在一项随机实用试验中,为最近诊断为纤维肌痛的患者提供三种不同干预措施之一后的资源利用和直接成本。
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 May;35(5):1307-15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-3067-y. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Cost-utility of cognitive behavioral therapy versus U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended drugs and usual care in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: an economic evaluation alongside a 6-month randomized controlled trial.认知行为疗法与美国食品药品监督管理局推荐药物及常规护理在纤维肌痛患者治疗中的成本效益:一项经济评估与为期6个月的随机对照试验
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Oct 1;16(5):451. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0451-y.
9
Therapeutic benefit of balneotherapy and hydrotherapy in the management of fibromyalgia syndrome: a qualitative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.温泉疗法和水疗法对纤维肌痛综合征的治疗益处:一项关于随机对照试验的定性系统评价和荟萃分析
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jul 7;16(4):R141. doi: 10.1186/ar4603.
10
Fibromyalgia: disease synopsis, medication cost effectiveness and economic burden.纤维肌痛:疾病概述、药物成本效益及经济负担
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 May;32(5):457-66. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0137-y.