Guan Yuan, Shi Ruina, Li Xiaomin, Zhao Meiping, Li Yuanzong
The Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry & Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Jun 28;111(25):7336-44. doi: 10.1021/jp066344e. Epub 2007 May 26.
The binding of dicationic Hoechst 33258 (ligand) to DNA was characterized by means of the fluorescence spectra, fluorescence intensity titration, time-resolved fluorescence decay, light scattering, circular dichroism, and fluorescence thermal denaturation measurements, and two binding modes were distinguished by the experimental results. Type 1 binding has the stoichiometry of one ligand to more than 12 base pairs, and it is defined as quasi-minor groove binding which has the typical prolonged fluorescence lifetime of about 4.4 ns. In type 1 binding, planar conformation of the ligand is favorable. Type 2 binding with phosphate to ligand ratio (P/L) < 2.5 has the stoichiometry of one ligand to two phosphates. It is defined as a highly dense and orderly stacked binding with DNA backbone as the template. Electrostatic interactions between doubly protonated ligands and negatively charged DNA backbone play a predominant role in the type 2 binding mode. The characteristics of this type of binding result in a twisted conformation of the ligand that has a fluorescence lifetime of less than 1 ns. The results also indicate that the binding is in a cooperative manner primarily by stacking of the aromatic rings of the neighboring ligands. Type 1 binding is only observed for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) with affinity constant of 1.83 x 10(7) M-1. In the type 2 binding mode, the binding affinity constants are 4.9 x 10(6) and 4.3 x 10(6) M-1 for dsDNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), respectively. The type 2 binding is base pair independent while the type 1 binding is base pair related. The experiments described in this paper revealed that the dication bindings are different from the monocation bindings reported by previous study. The dication binding leads to stronger aggregation at low ligand concentration and results in orderly arrangements of the ligands along DNA chains. Furthermore the dication binding is demonstrated to be beneficial for enhancing the DNA's stability.
通过荧光光谱、荧光强度滴定、时间分辨荧光衰减、光散射、圆二色性和荧光热变性测量等手段对双阳离子型Hoechst 33258(配体)与DNA的结合进行了表征,实验结果区分出两种结合模式。1型结合的化学计量比为一个配体对应超过12个碱基对,它被定义为准小沟结合,具有约4.4 ns的典型延长荧光寿命。在1型结合中,配体的平面构象是有利的。磷酸与配体比率(P/L)<2.5的2型结合的化学计量比为一个配体对应两个磷酸。它被定义为以DNA主链为模板的高度密集且有序堆积的结合。双质子化配体与带负电荷的DNA主链之间的静电相互作用在2型结合模式中起主要作用。这种结合类型的特征导致配体呈扭曲构象,其荧光寿命小于1 ns。结果还表明,结合主要通过相邻配体芳香环的堆积以协同方式进行。仅在双链DNA(dsDNA)中观察到1型结合,其亲和常数为1.83×10⁷ M⁻¹。在2型结合模式中,dsDNA和单链DNA(ssDNA)的结合亲和常数分别为4.9×10⁶和4.3×10⁶ M⁻¹。2型结合与碱基对无关,而1型结合与碱基对有关。本文所述实验表明,双阳离子结合不同于先前研究报道的单阳离子结合。双阳离子结合在低配体浓度下导致更强的聚集,并使配体沿DNA链有序排列。此外,双阳离子结合被证明有利于增强DNA的稳定性。