Suppr超能文献

监测奥林匹克举重运动员动态表现的器械验证

Validation of instrumentation to monitor dynamic performance of olympic weightlifters.

作者信息

Bruenger Adam J, Smith Sarah L, Sands William A, Leigh Michael R

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2007 May;21(2):492-9. doi: 10.1519/R-20756.1.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy and reliability of the Weightlifting Video Overlay System (WVOS) used by coaches and sport biomechanists at the United States Olympic Training Center. Static trials with the bar set at specific positions and dynamic trials of a power snatch were performed. Static and dynamic values obtained by the WVOS were compared with values obtained by tape measure and standard video kinematic analysis. Coordinate positions (horizontal [X] and vertical [Y]) were compared on both ends (left and right) of the bar. Absolute technical error of measurement between WVOS and kinematic values were calculated (0.97 cm [left X], 0.98 cm [right X], 0.88 cm [left Y], and 0.53 cm [right Y]) for the static data. Pearson correlations for all dynamic trials exceeded r = 0.88. The greatest discrepancies between the 2 measuring systems were found to occur when there was twisting of the bar during the performance. This error was probably due to the location on the bar where the coordinates were measured. The WVOS appears to provide accurate position information when compared with standard kinematics; however, care must be taken in evaluating position measurements if there is a significant amount of twisting in the movement. The WVOS appears to be reliable and valid within reasonable error limits for the determination of weightlifting movement technique.

摘要

本研究的目的是验证美国奥林匹克训练中心教练和运动生物力学专家所使用的举重视频叠加系统(WVOS)的准确性和可靠性。进行了将杠铃设置在特定位置的静态试验以及抓举的动态试验。将WVOS获得的静态和动态值与通过卷尺测量和标准视频运动学分析获得的值进行比较。在杠铃的两端(左侧和右侧)比较坐标位置(水平[X]和垂直[Y])。针对静态数据计算了WVOS与运动学值之间的绝对测量技术误差(左侧X为0.97厘米,右侧X为0.98厘米,左侧Y为0.88厘米,右侧Y为0.53厘米)。所有动态试验的皮尔逊相关系数均超过r = 0.88。发现当动作过程中杠铃发生扭转时,两种测量系统之间的差异最大。这种误差可能是由于在杠铃上测量坐标的位置所致。与标准运动学相比,WVOS似乎能提供准确的位置信息;然而,如果运动中有大量扭转,在评估位置测量时必须谨慎。WVOS在确定举重动作技术的合理误差范围内似乎是可靠且有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验