Hirohata Atsushi, Nakamura Mamoo, Waseda Katsuhisa, Honda Yasuhiro, Lee David P, Vagelos Randall H, Hunt Sharon A, Valantine Hannah A, Yock Paul G, Fitzgerald Peter J, Yeung Alan C, Fearon William F
Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 1;99(11):1603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.039. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a progressive process involving the epicardial and microvascular coronary systems. The timing of the development of abnormalities in these 2 compartments and the correlation between changes in physiology and anatomy are undefined. The invasive evaluation of coronary artery anatomy and physiology with intravascular ultrasound, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery during 151 angiographic evaluations of asymptomatic heart transplant recipients from 0 to >5 years after heart transplantation (HT). There was no angiographic evidence of significant CAV, but during the first year after HT, fractional flow reserve decreased significantly (0.89 +/- 0.06 vs 0.85 +/- 0.07, p = 0.001), and percentage plaque volume derived by intravascular ultrasound increased significantly (15.6 +/- 7.7% to 22.5 +/- 12.3%, p = 0.0002), resulting in a significant inverse correlation between epicardial physiology and anatomy (r = -0.58, p <0.0001). The IMR was lower in these patients compared with those > or =2 years after HT (24.1 +/- 14.3 vs 29.4 +/- 18.8 units, p = 0.05), suggesting later spread of CAV to the microvasculature. As the IMR increased, fractional flow reserve increased (0.86 +/- 0.06 to 0.90 +/- 0.06, p = 0.0035 comparing recipients with IMRs < or =20 to those with IMRs > or =40), despite no difference in percentage plaque volume (21.0 +/- 11.2% vs 20.5 +/- 10.5%, p = NS). In conclusion, early after HT, anatomic and physiologic evidence of epicardial CAV was found. Later after HT, the physiologic effect of epicardial CAV may be less, because of increased microvascular dysfunction.
心脏移植血管病变(CAV)是一个涉及心外膜和微血管冠状动脉系统的渐进过程。这两个腔室异常发展的时间以及生理和解剖变化之间的相关性尚不清楚。在心脏移植(HT)后0至5年以上的151例无症状心脏移植受者的血管造影评估中,对左前降支冠状动脉进行了血管内超声、血流储备分数、冠状动脉血流储备和微循环阻力指数(IMR)的冠状动脉解剖和生理的侵入性评估。没有血管造影证据显示存在明显的CAV,但在HT后的第一年,血流储备分数显著下降(0.89±0.06对0.85±0.07,p = 0.001),血管内超声得出的斑块体积百分比显著增加(15.6±7.7%至22.5±12.3%,p = 0.0002),导致心外膜生理与解剖之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.58,p <0.0001)。与HT后≥2年的患者相比,这些患者的IMR较低(24.1±14.3对29.4±18.8单位,p = 0.05),提示CAV向微血管的扩散较晚。随着IMR增加,血流储备分数增加(0.86±0.06至0.90±0.06,将IMR≤20的受者与IMR≥40的受者比较,p = 0.0035),尽管斑块体积百分比无差异(21.0±11.2%对20.5±10.5%,p = 无显著性差异)。总之,HT后早期发现了心外膜CAV的解剖和生理证据。HT后晚期,由于微血管功能障碍增加,心外膜CAV的生理效应可能较小。