Suppr超能文献

心脏移植后冠状动脉解剖结构和生理功能的变化。

Changes in coronary anatomy and physiology after heart transplantation.

作者信息

Hirohata Atsushi, Nakamura Mamoo, Waseda Katsuhisa, Honda Yasuhiro, Lee David P, Vagelos Randall H, Hunt Sharon A, Valantine Hannah A, Yock Paul G, Fitzgerald Peter J, Yeung Alan C, Fearon William F

机构信息

Center for Research in Cardiovascular Interventions, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 1;99(11):1603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.039. Epub 2007 Apr 19.

Abstract

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a progressive process involving the epicardial and microvascular coronary systems. The timing of the development of abnormalities in these 2 compartments and the correlation between changes in physiology and anatomy are undefined. The invasive evaluation of coronary artery anatomy and physiology with intravascular ultrasound, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) was performed in the left anterior descending coronary artery during 151 angiographic evaluations of asymptomatic heart transplant recipients from 0 to >5 years after heart transplantation (HT). There was no angiographic evidence of significant CAV, but during the first year after HT, fractional flow reserve decreased significantly (0.89 +/- 0.06 vs 0.85 +/- 0.07, p = 0.001), and percentage plaque volume derived by intravascular ultrasound increased significantly (15.6 +/- 7.7% to 22.5 +/- 12.3%, p = 0.0002), resulting in a significant inverse correlation between epicardial physiology and anatomy (r = -0.58, p <0.0001). The IMR was lower in these patients compared with those > or =2 years after HT (24.1 +/- 14.3 vs 29.4 +/- 18.8 units, p = 0.05), suggesting later spread of CAV to the microvasculature. As the IMR increased, fractional flow reserve increased (0.86 +/- 0.06 to 0.90 +/- 0.06, p = 0.0035 comparing recipients with IMRs < or =20 to those with IMRs > or =40), despite no difference in percentage plaque volume (21.0 +/- 11.2% vs 20.5 +/- 10.5%, p = NS). In conclusion, early after HT, anatomic and physiologic evidence of epicardial CAV was found. Later after HT, the physiologic effect of epicardial CAV may be less, because of increased microvascular dysfunction.

摘要

心脏移植血管病变(CAV)是一个涉及心外膜和微血管冠状动脉系统的渐进过程。这两个腔室异常发展的时间以及生理和解剖变化之间的相关性尚不清楚。在心脏移植(HT)后0至5年以上的151例无症状心脏移植受者的血管造影评估中,对左前降支冠状动脉进行了血管内超声、血流储备分数、冠状动脉血流储备和微循环阻力指数(IMR)的冠状动脉解剖和生理的侵入性评估。没有血管造影证据显示存在明显的CAV,但在HT后的第一年,血流储备分数显著下降(0.89±0.06对0.85±0.07,p = 0.001),血管内超声得出的斑块体积百分比显著增加(15.6±7.7%至22.5±12.3%,p = 0.0002),导致心外膜生理与解剖之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.58,p <0.0001)。与HT后≥2年的患者相比,这些患者的IMR较低(24.1±14.3对29.4±18.8单位,p = 0.05),提示CAV向微血管的扩散较晚。随着IMR增加,血流储备分数增加(0.86±0.06至0.90±0.06,将IMR≤20的受者与IMR≥40的受者比较,p = 0.0035),尽管斑块体积百分比无差异(21.0±11.2%对20.5±10.5%,p = 无显著性差异)。总之,HT后早期发现了心外膜CAV的解剖和生理证据。HT后晚期,由于微血管功能障碍增加,心外膜CAV的生理效应可能较小。

相似文献

1
Changes in coronary anatomy and physiology after heart transplantation.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 1;99(11):1603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.039. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
3
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Early After Heart Transplantation.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 13;69(23):2832-2841. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.598.
7
Influence of microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve after successful percutaneous coronary intervention.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;85(4):585-92. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25499. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
9
Cardiac PET Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification Assessment of Early Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jun;17(6):642-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Invasive Coronary Physiology in Heart Transplant Recipients: State-of-the-Art Review.
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Mar 21;2(3):100627. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100627. eCollection 2023 May-Jun.
2
Temporal changes in CT-derived fractional flow reserve in patients after heart transplantation.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):232-243. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10932-z. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve and Graft Vasculopathy in Heart Transplant Recipients.
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jul 12;2020:9835151. doi: 10.1155/2020/9835151. eCollection 2020.
6
The role of optical coherence tomography and other intravascular imaging modalities in cardiac allograft vasculopathy.
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Mar;16(1):19-29. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.93909. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
7
Coronary physiology assessment in a cardiac transplant patient.
Neth Heart J. 2019 Jul;27(7-8):385-386. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1300-z.
9
Diagnosis and management of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children and adolescents.
World J Transplant. 2014 Dec 24;4(4):276-93. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i4.276.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in coronary arterial dimensions early after cardiac transplantation.
Transplantation. 2007 Mar 27;83(6):700-5. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000256335.84363.9b.
5
6
Cardiac transplantation and resistance artery myogenic tone.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004 Oct;82(10):840-8. doi: 10.1139/y04-100.
7
Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance.
Circulation. 2004 Oct 12;110(15):2137-42. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143893.18451.0E. Epub 2004 Oct 4.
8
Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation.
Circulation. 2004 May 18;109(19):2269-72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128669.99355.CB. Epub 2004 May 10.
10
Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation.
Circulation. 2003 Jul 1;107(25):3129-32. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1. Epub 2003 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验