Suppr超能文献

罗哌卡因、布比卡因和左旋布比卡因用于分娩硬膜外镇痛的疗效。

Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia.

作者信息

Sah Neera, Vallejo Manuel, Phelps Amy, Finegold Helene, Mandell Gordon, Ramanathan Sivam

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2007 May;19(3):214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.11.003.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare analgesic efficacy and intensity of motor block with continuous infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor epidural analgesia.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Labor and delivery suite at Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.

PATIENTS

162 ASA physical status I and II, full-term, primiparous women.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received epidural labor analgesia. Epidural medication consisted of an initial bolus of 8 mL local anesthetic with fentanyl (100 microg) followed by an infusion at 12 mL/h of local anesthetic with 2 microg/mL fentanyl. Patients were allocated to one of three groups, as follows: group 1 received bolus and infusion of bupivacaine 0.125%, group 2 received bolus and infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125%, and group 3 received a bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% and infusion of ropivacaine 0.1%.

MEASUREMENTS

Maternal vital signs, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, sensory levels, and motor block (Bromage score) were recorded every hour. Duration of first and second stage of labor and mode of delivery were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in pain VAS or Bromage motor scores among the three groups of patients at any of the measured time intervals. The time to achieve T10 sensory level and patient comfort was shorter in the ropivacaine (9.35 +/- 4.96 min) and levobupivacaine (9.56 +/- 4.71 min) groups than the bupivacaine (11.89 +/- 7.76 min) group, although this difference did not reach a statistically significant level (P = 0.06). The second stage was significantly shorter in the bupivacaine group, lasting 81.27 +/- 63.3 min, compared with the ropivacaine group (121.69 +/- 86.5 min) and the levobupivacaine (115.5 +/- 83.6 minutes) group (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

There are no significant differences in pain VAS and Bromage scores between 0.1% ropivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, and 0.1% levobupivacaine given for labor epidural analgesia.

摘要

研究目的

比较罗哌卡因、布比卡因和左旋布比卡因持续输注联合芬太尼用于分娩硬膜外镇痛的镇痛效果及运动阻滞强度。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

地点

宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市梅杰妇女医院的分娩套房。

患者

162例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级的足月初产妇。

干预措施

所有患者均接受硬膜外分娩镇痛。硬膜外用药包括初始推注8 mL含芬太尼(100微克)的局部麻醉药,随后以12 mL/h的速度输注含2微克/毫升芬太尼的局部麻醉药。患者被分为三组,如下:第1组接受0.125%布比卡因的推注和输注,第2组接受0.125%左旋布比卡因的推注和输注,第3组接受0.2%罗哌卡因的推注和0.1%罗哌卡因的输注。

测量指标

每小时记录产妇生命体征、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、感觉平面和运动阻滞( Bromage评分)。记录第一产程和第二产程的持续时间及分娩方式。

结果

在任何测量时间间隔内,三组患者的疼痛VAS或Bromage运动评分均无统计学显著差异。罗哌卡因组(9.35±4.96分钟)和左旋布比卡因组(9.56±4.71分钟)达到T10感觉平面和患者舒适度的时间比布比卡因组(11.89±7.76分钟)短,尽管这种差异未达到统计学显著水平(P = 0.06)。布比卡因组的第二产程明显较短,持续81.27±63.3分钟,而罗哌卡因组为(121.69±86.5分钟),左旋布比卡因组为(115.5±83.6分钟)(P = 0.04)。

结论

0.1%罗哌卡因、0.125%布比卡因和0.1%左旋布比卡因用于分娩硬膜外镇痛时,疼痛VAS和Bromage评分无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验