• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模体材料和尺寸对电离室在水吸收剂量校准方面影响的研究。

Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.

作者信息

Arib Mehenna, Medjadj Toufik, Boudouma Youcef

机构信息

Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, Nuclear Research Centre of Algiers, Algeria.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Aug 24;7(3):55-64. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2264.

DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2264
PMID:17533342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5722429/
Abstract

In the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) code of practice (TRS 398) and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's dosimetry protocol (TG-51), full-scatter water phantoms are recommended for the determination of the absorbed dose for both photon and electron beams and, consequently, for the calibration of the user's ionization chambers. This procedure is applied in the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, where the calibration is performed on a 60Co gamma beam, in comparison with reference chambers whose absorbed dose-to-water calibration coefficients, ND,w, are known. In this work, we present the results of the calibration of 10 Farmer-like ionization chambers calibrated in three water phantoms (sizes 20 x 20 x 15 cm3, 30 x 30 x 30 cm3, and 35 x 35 x 37 cm3) and two plastic phantoms (size 20 x 20 x 20 cm3) polymethyl methacrlyate (PMMA) and polystyrene). Calibrations are performed by the substitution method using an ionization chamber whose ND,w has been supplied by the IAEA's reference laboratory. It is shown that the results, expressed as the percentage ratio of the calibration coefficient in a given phantom to that of the standard IAEA phantom, is less than 0.35% for all investigated chambers, and that the standard deviation of the mean of the ND,w calibration coefficients determined in all five phantoms is less than 0.06%, except for one nylon-walled ionization chamber, where the observed 0.34% value could be explained by the hygroscopic properties of nylon. Furthermore, a chamber-to-chamber dependence of the calibration coefficient has been shown to vary by up to 2.8%. These results emphasize that the phantom dimensions and its material are not sensitive criteria for the calibration of cylindrical ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water. The results also show that generic calibration coefficients could not be considered for a given type of chamber.

摘要

在国际原子能机构(IAEA)的实践准则(TRS 398)和美国医学物理学家协会的剂量测定协议(TG - 51)中,推荐使用全散射水模体来确定光子束和电子束的吸收剂量,进而用于用户电离室的校准。此程序应用于二级标准剂量测定实验室,该实验室在60Co伽马射线下进行校准,并与已知吸收剂量 - 水校准系数ND,w的参考电离室进行比较。在这项工作中,我们展示了在三个水模体(尺寸分别为20×20×15 cm3、30×30×30 cm3和35×35×37 cm3)以及两个塑料模体(尺寸为20×20×20 cm3,材料分别为聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和聚苯乙烯)中校准10个类 Farmer 电离室的结果。校准采用替代法,使用一个由IAEA参考实验室提供ND,w的电离室。结果表明,以给定模体中的校准系数与标准IAEA模体中的校准系数的百分比比值表示,所有研究的电离室该比值均小于0.35%,并且在所有五个模体中确定的ND,w校准系数平均值的标准偏差小于0.06%,但有一个尼龙壁电离室除外,其观测到的0.34%的值可由尼龙的吸湿特性来解释。此外,已表明校准系数的室间依赖性变化高达2.8%。这些结果强调,就水吸收剂量而言,模体尺寸及其材料对于圆柱形电离室的校准并非敏感标准。结果还表明,对于给定类型的电离室不能考虑通用校准系数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/17ea58849e59/ACM2-7-55-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/2089dd0f3ebf/ACM2-7-55-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/acf236357a34/ACM2-7-55-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/17ea58849e59/ACM2-7-55-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/2089dd0f3ebf/ACM2-7-55-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/acf236357a34/ACM2-7-55-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518f/5722429/17ea58849e59/ACM2-7-55-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.模体材料和尺寸对电离室在水吸收剂量校准方面影响的研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Aug 24;7(3):55-64. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i3.2264.
2
A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.校准方案的伽马立体定向放射外科剂量测定机构间循环比较。
Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6745-56. doi: 10.1118/1.4934376.
3
Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.国际原子能机构(IAEA)TRS - 398与美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG - 51高能光子和电子束剂量测定中水中吸收剂量协议的比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46(11):2985-3006. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/11/315.
4
Reference dose determination in 60Co and high-energy radiotherapy photon beams by using Farmer-type cylindrical ionization chambers - an experimental investigation.利用 Farmer 型圆柱形电离室在 60Co 和高能放射治疗光子束中确定参考剂量 - 一项实验研究。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 May 6;6(4):045003. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab8b25.
5
Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.不同剂量测定方案下高能光子与电子剂量测定的比较。
Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):857-68. doi: 10.1118/1.1470208.
6
A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.一项在三种临床电子束能量下比较NCS报告-5、国际原子能机构TRS-381、美国医学物理师协会TG-51和国际原子能机构TRS-398的剂量学研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2003 May 7;48(9):1091-107. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/9/301.
7
Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.高能光子和电子束剂量测定规程:国际原子能机构TRS - 398与以往国际实用规程的比较。国际原子能机构
Phys Med Biol. 2002 Sep 7;47(17):3033-53. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/17/301.
8
AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)关于高能光子和电子束临床参考剂量测定的TG-51协议。
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70. doi: 10.1118/1.598691.
9
Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.低能表面近距离放射治疗剂量测定中不同校准方案和电离室的比较与不确定度评估。
Med Phys. 2015 Aug;42(8):4954-64. doi: 10.1118/1.4927059.
10
Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.使用圆柱形和平行板电离室对质子束进行电离室剂量测定。Nw与Nk电离室校准。
Phys Med Biol. 1995 Jul;40(7):1161-76. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/40/7/002.

引用本文的文献

1
Monte Carlo Simulation of TRIM Algorithm in Ceramic Biomaterial in Proton Therapy.质子治疗中陶瓷生物材料TRIM算法的蒙特卡罗模拟
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;16(13):4833. doi: 10.3390/ma16134833.
2
Uncertainty in positioning ion chamber at reference depth for various water phantoms.在各种水模体的参考深度处定位电离室时的不确定性。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)关于高能光子和电子束临床参考剂量测定的TG-51协议。
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70. doi: 10.1118/1.598691.
2
Variations in response to radiation of a nylon-walled ionization chamber induced by humidity changes.湿度变化引起的尼龙壁电离室对辐射响应的变化。
Med Phys. 1985 Sep-Oct;12(5):625-6. doi: 10.1118/1.595683.
3
Comparison of recent codes of practice for high-energy photon dosimetry.近期高能光子剂量测定实用规范的比较。
Phys Med Biol. 1986 Apr;31(4):407-16. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/31/4/006.
4
Choice of the measuring quantity for therapy-level dosemeters.治疗级剂量仪测量量的选择。
Phys Med Biol. 1979 Sep;24(5):895-900. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/24/5/002.