Hays Scott P
Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Center for Prevention Research and Development, University of Illinois, 61820, USA.
J Drug Educ. 2006;36(4):279-95. doi: 10.2190/Q416-72W4-7518-2505.
Understanding the attitudes of restaurant and bar owners and managers toward a smokefree city ordinance can contribute greatly to the success of a smokefree policy campaign. While local opposition to a smokefree policy always arises from restaurant and bar owners, this study of restaurant and bar owners and managers in two Midwestern cities reveals that over two-thirds (67.1%) support a smokefree restaurant policy, and over 40% support a policy that would include bars. Moreover, most prefer the local government to require the city to be smokefree rather than choose to go smokefree on their own: only 1 in 5 would even consider going smokefree independently. The study explains that this is primarily due to widespread and unfounded fears of economic loss. Finally, the article recommends that education campaigns encouraging individual restaurants to go smokefree would be a far less effective strategy than persuading a municipal government to enact a smokefree ordinance.
了解餐厅和酒吧老板及经理对无烟城市条例的态度,对于无烟政策运动的成功大有帮助。虽然当地对无烟政策的反对总是来自餐厅和酒吧老板,但这项针对中西部两个城市的餐厅和酒吧老板及经理的研究表明,超过三分之二(67.1%)的人支持无烟餐厅政策,超过40%的人支持涵盖酒吧的政策。此外,大多数人更倾向于地方政府要求城市实行无烟,而不是自行选择无烟:只有五分之一的人会考虑独立实行无烟。该研究解释说,这主要是由于对经济损失的广泛且毫无根据的担忧。最后,文章建议,鼓励个别餐厅实行无烟的教育活动,远不如说服市政府颁布无烟条例有效。