• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节翻修术中的髋臼骨缺损:使用微粒化病毒灭活骨同种异体移植物和加强环进行重建。95 例患者的 7 年结果。

Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.

机构信息

Service d'orthopédie-traumatologie, hôpital Gabriel-Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, BP 69, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 01, France; Université Clermont-Auvergne, SIGMA Clermont, institut de chimie de Clermont-Ferrand, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; CNRS, UMR 6296, ICCF, 63178 Aubière, France.

Service d'orthopédie-traumatologie, hôpital Gabriel-Montpied, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, BP 69, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 01, France; Université Clermont-Auvergne, SIGMA Clermont, institut de chimie de Clermont-Ferrand, BP 10448, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; CNRS, UMR 6296, ICCF, 63178 Aubière, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.008
PMID:28366746
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acetabular cup loosening is among the main reasons for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The implantation of a cryopreserved morsellised bone allograft is a reference method for filling bone defects. However, the outcomes of bone grafts treated with viral inactivation and secured into the host bone (notably using a reinforcement device) are unclear. We therefore retrospectively reviewed cases of acetabular revision with morsellised bone allograft implanted into a reinforcement ring for acetabular revision to assess: (1) clinical survival of the acetabular implant (time to new revision with acetabular component removal), (2) radiological implant survival, (3) and bone graft osseointegration evaluated using Oswestry's criteria.

HYPOTHESIS

Virus-inactivated bone allografts provide similar outcomes to cryopreserved allografts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2004 to 2009, 95 patients underwent acetabular revision. There were 60 (63%) females and 35 (37%) males with a mean age of 71.7 years (range: 44.2-90 years). Over 90% of patients had bone defects type 2 or higher in the AAOS classification. Each patient was evaluated after at least 5 years, by an examiner who had not been involved in the revision and who determined the Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score and patient satisfaction. We assessed the clinical survival of the acetabular implant (time to new revision with acetabular implant removal), radiological implant survival (migration>5mm, active radiolucent line, failure of graft osseointegration, or reinforcement ring failure), and allograft osteointegration evaluated using Oswestry's criteria.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 7years (range: 5.2-10years), 7 (7.4%) patients had been lost to follow-up and 3 (3.4%) had required surgical revision, after 3 to 73 months (for aseptic loosening in 2 cases and infection in 1 case). The estimated 10-year survival rate was 96.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 88.2-98.7). The mean PMA score at last follow-up had increased significantly, by 2.8 points (p<0.05), to 13.8 (95%CI: 78.4-88.1). Of the 88 re-evaluated patients, 78 (89%) were satisfied or very satisfied. The overall radiological survival rate was 84.5% (95%CI: 78.4-88.1) after a mean of 5.9 years (range: 0.5-10). Allograft osseointegration was satisfactory (Oswestry score≥2) in 95.8% of patients.

DISCUSSION

In our population, allografts previously subjected to virus inactivation and implanted into a reinforcement ring produced outcomes similar to those reported previously with cryopreserved allografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case-series study.

摘要

背景

髋臼杯松动是全髋关节翻修术(THA)的主要原因之一。冷冻保存的颗粒状骨移植物的植入是填充骨缺损的参考方法。然而,经过病毒灭活处理并固定到宿主骨中的骨移植物(特别是使用增强装置)的结果尚不清楚。因此,我们回顾性分析了使用颗粒状骨移植物植入髋臼增强环进行髋臼翻修的病例,以评估:(1)髋臼植入物的临床存活率(需要新的髋臼组件移除的翻修时间),(2)放射学植入物存活率,(3)使用 Oswestry 标准评估骨移植物的骨整合情况。

假设

病毒灭活的同种异体移植物提供与冷冻保存同种异体移植物相似的结果。

材料和方法

2004 年至 2009 年,95 例患者接受了髋臼翻修。其中 60 例(63%)为女性,35 例(37%)为男性,平均年龄 71.7 岁(范围:44.2-90 岁)。超过 90%的患者在 AAOS 分类中存在 2 型或更高类型的骨缺损。每个患者至少随访 5 年,由未参与翻修的检查者进行评估,并确定 Postel-Merle d'Aubigné(PMA)评分和患者满意度。我们评估了髋臼植入物的临床存活率(需要新的髋臼植入物移除的翻修时间)、放射学植入物存活率(>5mm 的迁移、活跃的透明线、移植物骨整合失败或增强环失败),以及使用 Oswestry 标准评估同种异体骨整合情况。

结果

平均随访 7 年(范围:5.2-10 年)后,7 例(7.4%)患者失访,3 例(3.4%)需要手术翻修,时间为 3 至 73 个月(2 例为无菌性松动,1 例为感染)。10 年的估计生存率为 96.2%(95%置信区间[95%CI]:88.2-98.7)。末次随访时,PMA 评分平均显著增加 2.8 分(p<0.05),达到 13.8(95%CI:78.4-88.1)。在 88 例重新评估的患者中,78 例(89%)满意或非常满意。平均随访 5.9 年后(范围:0.5-10 年),总体放射学存活率为 84.5%(95%CI:78.4-88.1)。95.8%的患者同种异体骨整合情况良好(Oswestry 评分≥2)。

讨论

在我们的人群中,经过病毒灭活处理并植入增强环的同种异体移植物的结果与先前报道的冷冻保存同种异体移植物相似。

证据水平

IV,回顾性病例系列研究。

相似文献

1
Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.髋关节翻修术中的髋臼骨缺损:使用微粒化病毒灭活骨同种异体移植物和加强环进行重建。95 例患者的 7 年结果。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.使用 Kerboull 髋臼增强装置和结构性同种异体移植物翻修全髋关节置换术治疗髋臼严重缺陷。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3502-3509. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.029. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].[采用非骨水泥髋臼杯及打压植骨异体碎骨块进行全髋关节置换术中无菌性松动的髋臼翻修术]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
4
Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.使用 Kerboull 髋臼加强装置行全髋关节翻修术治疗累及髋臼下缘的 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼缺损:一项至少 5 年的随访研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jun 1;100-B(6):725-732. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1472.R1.
5
Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.全髋关节置换翻修术中使用甘茨加强环进行髋臼同种异体骨重建的影像学评估。
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Nov;15(6):764-71. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1549-y. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
6
The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.增强型模块化笼重建系统治疗严重髋臼缺损:两年临床和影像学结果。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2269-2278. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4271-6. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.使用带同种异体骨的Kerboull型髋臼强化装置进行全髋关节翻修术:至少4.5年的随访结果及力学分析
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1194-200. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26598.
8
Acetabular reconstruction using morselized allograft and a reinforcement ring for revision arthroplasty with Paprosky type II and III bone loss: survival analysis of 95 hips after 5 to 13 years.髋臼重建使用颗粒状同种异体骨和加强环治疗 Paprosky Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型骨缺损的翻修关节成形术:5 至 13 年后 95 髋的生存分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Apr;98(2):129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.11.003. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
9
Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.采用金属加强固定的双动髋臼杯进行全髋关节置换翻修术:62例病例系列,至少随访5年。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):679-684. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 31.
10
Bone Remodeling in Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull-Type Reinforcement Device and Structural Bone-Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty.使用Kerboull型增强装置和结构性植骨进行髋臼重建在全髋关节置换术中的骨重塑
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):908-914. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review.骨移植的研究进展:全面综述
Int J Nanomedicine. 2025 Apr 15;20:4729-4757. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S510524. eCollection 2025.
2
Debridement without bone grafting prevents osteolytic lesions progression in revision THAs with prosthesis revised.在翻修全髋关节置换术中,不进行植骨的清创术可防止假体周围溶骨性病变进展。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:925940. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.925940. eCollection 2022.
3
Biphasic bone graft substitute in revision total hip arthroplasty with significant acetabular bone defects : a retrospective analysis.
伴有严重髋臼骨缺损的翻修全髋关节置换术中的双相骨移植替代物:一项回顾性分析
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Dec;3(12):991-997. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.312.BJO-2022-0094.R1.
4
Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction.髋臼重建中采用低剂量辐照冻干同种异体骨移植治疗骨嵌塞。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2519-2526. doi: 10.1111/os.13471. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
5
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology.翻修伴有严重髋臼缺陷的全髋关节置换术:机器人辅助技术的初步探索和尝试。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1912-1917. doi: 10.1111/os.13368. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
6
Design and analysis of three-dimensional printing of a porous titanium scaffold.三维打印多孔钛支架的设计与分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Aug 2;22(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04520-1.
7
Quantitative assessment of acetabular bone defects: A study of 50 computed tomography data sets.髋臼骨缺损的定量评估:50 例 CT 数据研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0222511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222511. eCollection 2019.