Crawford Charles, Nyland John, Landes Sarah, Jackson Richard, Chang Haw Chong, Nawab Akbar, Caborn David N M
Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, 210 East Gray St., Suite 1003, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Aug;15(8):946-64; discussion 945. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0343-7. Epub 2007 May 30.
With the abundance of anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction techniques that currently exist and limited patient outcome data, one has to ask whether or not they should be used and if so, which one, and what is the learning curve for the average knee surgeon to become competent with the technique that they select? The purpose of this literature review is to summarize existing anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction surgical and rehabilitation techniques and the clinical and biomechanical study evidence that currently exists. In choosing to perform anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction we suggest that the knee surgeon should look for evidence of: (1) control of the pivot shift phenomenon, (2) improved transverse plane rotatory knee control during the performance of sports type movements, (3) a decreased likelihood of revision procedures either for ACL reconstruction or for treatment of associated primary or recurrent meniscal injuries, (4) improved patient self-reports of perceived function, satisfaction, and quality of life, and (5) radiographic evidence of a lower incidence and/or magnitude of osteoarthritic changes compared to conventional single bundle ACL reconstruction.
鉴于目前存在大量解剖双束前交叉韧带重建技术,而患者预后数据有限,人们不禁要问是否应该使用这些技术,如果使用,该选择哪一种,以及对于普通膝关节外科医生来说,掌握他们所选择的技术的学习曲线是怎样的?这篇文献综述的目的是总结现有的解剖双束前交叉韧带重建手术及康复技术,以及目前存在的临床和生物力学研究证据。在选择进行解剖双束前交叉韧带重建时,我们建议膝关节外科医生应寻找以下证据:(1)对轴移现象的控制;(2)在进行运动类型动作时,改善膝关节在横向平面的旋转控制;(3)降低因前交叉韧带重建或治疗相关原发性或复发性半月板损伤而进行翻修手术的可能性;(4)患者对感知功能、满意度和生活质量的自我报告得到改善;(5)与传统单束前交叉韧带重建相比,影像学证据显示骨关节炎改变的发生率和/或严重程度较低。