Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr 30;75:e1123. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1123. eCollection 2020.
The objective of this study was to compare two postero-lateral bundle (PLB) tibial fixation techniques for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with double bundle: a technique without the use of an interference screw, preserving the native tibial insertion of the tendons of the gracilis and semitendineous muscles, and a technique with the use of an interference screw and without preserving the insertion of the tendons.
A comparative study was conducted in cadavers with a universal mechanical test machine. In total, 23 cadaver knees were randomized for tibial fixation of the PLB using the two techniques: Maintaining the tibial insertion of the tendons during reconstruction, without the use of an interference screw (group A, 11 cases); and fixating the graft with an interference screw, without maintaining the insertion of the tendons (group B, 12 cases). A continuous traction was performed (20 mm/min) in the same direction as the produced tunnel, and force (N), elongation (mm), rigidity (N/mm), and tension (N/mm2) were objectively determined in each group.
Group A exhibited a maximum force (MF) of 315.4±124.7 N; maximum tension of 13.57±3.65 N/mm2; maximum elongation of 19.73±4.76 mm; force at the limit of proportionality (FLP) of 240.6±144.0 N; and an elongation at the limit of proportionality of 14.37±6.58 mm. Group B exhibited a MF of 195.7±71.8 N; maximum tension of 8.8±3.81 N/mm2; maximum elongation of 15.3±10.73 mm; FLP of 150.1±68.7 N; and an elongation at the limit of proportionality of 6.86±2.42 mm. When comparing the two groups, significant differences were observed in the variables of maximum force (p=0.016), maximum tension (p=0.019), maximum elongation (p=0.007), and elongation at the limit of proportionality (p=0.003).
The use of the native insertion of the semitendineous and gracilis tendons, without an additional fixation device, presented mechanical superiority over their fixation with interference screws.
本研究旨在比较两种后外侧束(PLB)胫骨固定技术在双束重建前交叉韧带中的应用:一种技术不使用干扰螺钉,保留了腘绳肌腱和半腱肌腱的原始胫骨止点;另一种技术使用干扰螺钉,但不保留肌腱止点。
在万能力学试验机上进行尸体对照研究。共随机选择 23 个尸体膝关节进行 PLB 胫骨固定:重建时保留肌腱的胫骨止点,不使用干扰螺钉(A 组,11 例);用干扰螺钉固定移植物,不保留肌腱止点(B 组,12 例)。以与产生隧道相同的方向进行连续牵引(20mm/min),并在每组中客观地确定力(N)、伸长(mm)、刚度(N/mm)和张力(N/mm2)。
A 组的最大力(MF)为 315.4±124.7N;最大张力为 13.57±3.65N/mm2;最大伸长率为 19.73±4.76mm;比例极限力(FLP)为 240.6±144.0N;比例极限伸长率为 14.37±6.58mm。B 组的 MF 为 195.7±71.8N;最大张力为 8.8±3.81N/mm2;最大伸长率为 15.3±10.73mm;FLP 为 150.1±68.7N;比例极限伸长率为 6.86±2.42mm。两组比较,最大力(p=0.016)、最大张力(p=0.019)、最大伸长率(p=0.007)和比例极限伸长率(p=0.003)差异有统计学意义。
不使用额外的固定装置保留半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱的原始止点,其力学性能优于使用干扰螺钉固定。