Croyle Kristin L, Waltz Jennifer
Department of Psychology and Anthropology, University of Texas-Pan American, Edinburg, TX 78541-2999, USA.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Apr;77(2):332-42. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.2.332.
This study examined characteristics associated with mildly injurious (fingernail biting, skin picking, etc.) and more injurious (cutting, burning, etc.) self-harm (SH) in an undergraduate sample (N = 280); 31% reported mildly injurious SH within the past 3 years with no more injurious SH, whereas 20% reported more injurious SH within the past 3 years. SH was not associated with significant general negative affect or history of physical or sexual abuse, although more injurious SH was associated with a history of emotional abuse. A portion of both groups reported negative affect regarding their histories of SH. Both types of SH were associated with other impulsive and disordered eating behaviors, some obsessive-compulsive characteristics, and more somatic symptoms. Similarities and differences with clinical SH are discussed, as well as implications for further research and treatment. Arguments for and against a continuum view of self-harm, as ranging from mild to severe in injuriousness or clinical significance, are also discussed.
本研究在一个本科样本(N = 280)中考察了与轻度伤害性(咬指甲、抠皮肤等)及更具伤害性(割伤、烧伤等)自我伤害(SH)相关的特征;31%的人报告在过去3年内有轻度伤害性自我伤害行为,且无更具伤害性的自我伤害行为,而20%的人报告在过去3年内有更具伤害性的自我伤害行为。自我伤害与显著的一般负面情绪或身体或性虐待史无关,尽管更具伤害性的自我伤害与情感虐待史有关。两组中都有一部分人对自己的自我伤害史表示负面情绪。两种类型的自我伤害都与其他冲动性和紊乱性饮食行为、一些强迫性特征以及更多的躯体症状有关。文中讨论了与临床自我伤害的异同,以及对进一步研究和治疗的启示。还讨论了支持和反对自我伤害从伤害性或临床意义上由轻到重的连续体观点的论据。