• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释简单推理任务中不恰当的策略选择。

Explaining inappropriate strategy selection in a simple reasoning task.

作者信息

Roberts Maxwell J, Taylor Richard J, Newton Elizabeth J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):627-44. doi: 10.1348/000712607X173763.

DOI:10.1348/000712607X173763
PMID:17535463
Abstract

People's strategy selections appear to reflect attempts to maximize performance by selecting the most effective option for a particular task or format. Theories that account for such behaviour will be named rational models of strategy selection. However, it is possible to find instances where people are apparently biased towards using less effective strategies, and such behaviour appears to go against these models. Two experiments are reported in which participants were instructed to use first one, and then the other of two possible strategies for solving a compass point directions task (the instructed phase), and were subsequently permitted to use any strategy (the free-choice phase). A substantial minority of participants selected the less effective spatial strategy during the free-choice phase. Overall, it was found that people who rely on the spatial strategy when given a free-choice tend to be those who: (1) have not been given particular incentive to perform as well as possible; (2) have difficulty executing the better alternative, cancellation and (3) are particularly prone to making errors at the spatial strategy. Hence, although evidence was found in support of rational models of strategy selection, it is also suggested that these must additionally take account of the motivational and conceptual difficulties that people may have with a task.

摘要

人们的策略选择似乎反映出他们试图通过为特定任务或形式选择最有效的选项来实现绩效最大化。解释此类行为的理论将被称为策略选择的理性模型。然而,有可能发现人们明显倾向于使用效率较低的策略的情况,而且这种行为似乎与这些模型相悖。本文报告了两项实验,在实验中,参与者被指示先使用两种可能的策略中的一种,然后再使用另一种来解决罗盘方向任务(指示阶段),随后被允许使用任何策略(自由选择阶段)。在自由选择阶段,相当一部分参与者选择了效率较低的空间策略。总体而言,研究发现,在自由选择时依赖空间策略的人往往是那些:(1)没有受到尽可能出色表现的特别激励的人;(2)在执行更好的替代策略(取消策略)方面有困难的人;(3)在空间策略上特别容易出错的人。因此,尽管有证据支持策略选择的理性模型,但也有人认为,这些模型还必须额外考虑人们在任务中可能遇到的动机和概念方面的困难。

相似文献

1
Explaining inappropriate strategy selection in a simple reasoning task.解释简单推理任务中不恰当的策略选择。
Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):627-44. doi: 10.1348/000712607X173763.
2
Inferences from memory: strategy- and exemplar-based judgment models compared.基于记忆的推断:策略型与范例型判断模型的比较
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Jan;130(1):25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
3
Do people reason on the Wason selection task? A new look at the data of Ball et al. (2003).人们在沃森选择任务中会进行推理吗?对鲍尔等人(2003年)的数据的重新审视。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):434-41. doi: 10.1080/17470210903398147.
4
Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning.一生中的逻辑与信念:三段论推理中信念抑制的起伏
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00746.x.
5
Reasoning and dyslexia: a spatial strategy may impede reasoning with visually rich information.推理与阅读障碍:一种空间策略可能会妨碍对视觉信息丰富的内容进行推理。
Br J Psychol. 2007 Feb;98(Pt 1):79-92. doi: 10.1348/000712606X103987.
6
Perspectives of probabilistic inferences: Reinforcement learning and an adaptive network compared.概率推理的视角:强化学习与自适应网络的比较
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1355-70. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1355.
7
From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure.从压力下的不佳表现到成功:工作记忆、策略选择与压力下的数学问题解决
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Nov;33(6):983-98. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.983.
8
Cognitive niches: an ecological model of strategy selection.认知生态位:策略选择的生态模型。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;118(3):393-437. doi: 10.1037/a0024143.
9
Deciding between accounts of the selection task: a reply to Oaksford (2002).关于选择任务各观点间的抉择:对奥克斯福德(2002年)的回应
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2003 Aug;56(6):1079-88. doi: 10.1080/02724980245000034.
10
The suppression of q card selections: evidence for deductive inference in Wason's selection task.对Q卡片选择的抑制:沃森选择任务中演绎推理的证据
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Nov;53(4):1224-42. doi: 10.1080/713755944.