Suppr超能文献

韦氏成人阅读测验的表现会受到创伤性脑损伤的影响吗?

Is performance on the Wechsler test of adult reading affected by traumatic brain injury?

作者信息

Mathias J L, Bowden S C, Bigler E D, Rosenfeld J V

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 2007 Nov;46(Pt 4):457-66. doi: 10.1348/014466507X190197.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The validity of the National Adult Reading Test (NART) as a predictor of premorbid IQ when used with patients who have sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been questioned in recent years. This study examined whether performance on the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) is similarly affected by TBI in the first year after an injury.

DESIGN AND METHOD

The WTAR scores of participants who had sustained a mild TBI (N=82), moderate TBI (N=73), severe TBI (N=61) or an orthopaedic injury (N=95) were compared (cross-sectional study). A subset of 21 mild TBI, 31 moderate TBI, 26 severe TBI and 21 control group participants were additionally reassessed 6 months later to assess the impact of recovery on WTAR scores (longitudinal study).

RESULTS

The severe TBI group had significantly lower scores on the WTAR than the mild TBI, moderate TBI and control groups in the cross-sectional study, despite being matched demographically. The findings from the longitudinal study revealed a significant group difference and a small improvement in performance over time but the interaction between group and time was not significant, suggesting that the improvements in WTAR performance over time were not restricted to more severely injured individuals whose performance was temporarily suppressed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that reading performance may be affected by severe TBI and that the WTAR may underestimate premorbid IQ when used in this context, which may cause clinicians to underestimate the cognitive deficits experienced by these patients.

摘要

目的

近年来,当国家成人阅读测试(NART)用于脑外伤(TBI)患者时,其作为病前智商预测指标的有效性受到质疑。本研究调查了韦氏成人阅读测验(WTAR)的表现是否在脑外伤后的第一年同样受到TBI的影响。

设计与方法

比较了轻度脑外伤(N = 82)、中度脑外伤(N = 73)、重度脑外伤(N = 61)或骨科损伤(N = 95)患者的WTAR分数(横断面研究)。另外,对21名轻度脑外伤、31名中度脑外伤、26名重度脑外伤和21名对照组参与者进行了6个月后的重新评估,以评估恢复情况对WTAR分数的影响(纵向研究)。

结果

在横断面研究中,尽管重度脑外伤组在人口统计学上匹配,但该组的WTAR分数显著低于轻度脑外伤、中度脑外伤和对照组。纵向研究结果显示,组间存在显著差异,且随着时间推移表现有小幅改善,但组与时间的交互作用不显著,这表明随着时间推移WTAR表现的改善并不局限于表现暂时受抑制的重伤患者。

结论

这些发现表明,阅读表现可能受到重度脑外伤的影响,在此背景下使用WTAR时可能会低估病前智商,这可能导致临床医生低估这些患者所经历的认知缺陷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验