Suppr超能文献

对伴有复杂轻度、中度和重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的个体进行韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的检查。

An examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) in individuals with complicated mild, moderate and Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

机构信息

a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109-2800 , USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(1):21-37. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1005677. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

Abstract

This study examined the clinical utility of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) in individuals with complicated mild, moderate or severe TBI. One hundred individuals with TBI (n = 35 complicated mild or moderate TBI; n = 65 severe TBI) and 100 control participants matched on key demographic variables from the WAIS-IV normative dataset completed the WAIS-IV. Univariate analyses indicated that participants with severe TBI had poorer performance than matched controls on all index scores and subtests (except Matrix Reasoning). Individuals with complicated mild/moderate TBI performed more poorly than controls on the Working Memory Index (WMI), Processing Speed Index (PSI), and Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), and on four subtests: the two processing speed subtests (SS, CD), two working memory subtests (AR, LN), and a perceptual reasoning subtest (BD). Participants with severe TBI had significantly lower scores than the complicated mild/moderate TBI on PSI, and on three subtests: the two processing speed subtests (SS and CD), and the new visual puzzles test. Effect sizes for index and subtest scores were generally small-to-moderate for the group with complicated mild/moderate and moderate-to-large for the group with severe TBI. PSI also showed good sensitivity and specificity for classifying individuals with severe TBI versus controls. Findings provide support for the clinical utility of the WAIS-IV in individuals with complicated mild, moderate, and severe TBI.

摘要

本研究考察了韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)在复杂轻度、中度或重度 TBI 个体中的临床应用。100 名 TBI 患者(n=35 例复杂轻度或中度 TBI;n=65 例重度 TBI)和 100 名与 WAIS-IV 常模数据集关键人口统计学变量相匹配的对照组参与者完成了 WAIS-IV。单变量分析表明,重度 TBI 组在所有指数得分和子测试上(除了矩阵推理)的表现均比匹配对照组差。复杂轻度/中度 TBI 个体在工作记忆指数(WMI)、处理速度指数(PSI)和全量表智商(FSIQ),以及四个子测试上的表现比对照组差:两个处理速度子测试(SS、CD)、两个工作记忆子测试(AR、LN)和一个知觉推理子测试(BD)。重度 TBI 组的 PSI 得分明显低于复杂轻度/中度 TBI 组,而且在三个子测试上的得分也低于复杂轻度/中度 TBI 组:两个处理速度子测试(SS 和 CD)和新的视觉推理测试。对于复杂轻度/中度 TBI 组和重度 TBI 组,指数和子测试得分的效应大小通常为小到中等,而对于重度 TBI 组则为中到大。PSI 也显示出了良好的敏感性和特异性,可用于区分重度 TBI 患者和对照组。这些发现为 WAIS-IV 在复杂轻度、中度和重度 TBI 个体中的临床应用提供了支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验