Suppr超能文献

治疗前CORE-OM和BDI-I的稳定性:来自常规实践的证据。

Stability of the CORE-OM and the BDI-I prior to therapy: evidence from routine practice.

作者信息

Barkham Michael, Mullin Tracy, Leach Chris, Stiles William B, Lucock Mike

机构信息

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Psychother. 2007 Jun;80(Pt 2):269-78. doi: 10.1348/147608306X148048.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is important to know the stability of standard outcome measures prior to therapy over differing periods of time that map onto the realities of waiting times in routine service settings.

METHOD

We studied 1,684 clients who completed one or both the targeted measures Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measures (CORE-OM) and Beck Depression Inventory-I (BDI-I) two times, at intervals of up to 12 months, prior to beginning psychotherapy. We also selected an additional 1,623 clients who completed the CORE-OM (N=1,623), BDI-I (N=980) or both at referral, but had no records of further contact with the service.

RESULTS

There was little change in the mean CORE-OM or BDI-I scores between referral and clinical assessment. The test-retest correlations showed substantial stability on both measures, declining only moderately at the longer intervals studied.

CONCLUSION

The high test-retest correlations for periods of up to 6 months suggest that psychological disturbance was both reliably measured by the CORE-OM and the BDI-I, and reasonably stable among clients waiting to be assessed. Implications for routine practice are discussed.

摘要

背景

在治疗前了解标准疗效指标在不同时间段内的稳定性很重要,这些时间段应与常规服务环境中的等待时间实际情况相符。

方法

我们研究了1684名在开始心理治疗前,间隔长达12个月两次完成目标测量——常规评估结果测量(CORE-OM)和贝克抑郁量表第一版(BDI-I)的客户。我们还选择了另外1623名在转诊时完成了CORE-OM(N = 1623)、BDI-I(N = 980)或两者的客户,但没有与该服务机构进一步接触的记录。

结果

从转诊到临床评估期间,CORE-OM或BDI-I的平均得分几乎没有变化。重测相关性表明这两项测量都具有很高的稳定性,在研究的较长间隔时间内仅适度下降。

结论

长达6个月期间的高重测相关性表明,CORE-OM和BDI-I都能可靠地测量心理困扰,并且在等待评估的客户中相当稳定。文中讨论了对常规实践的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验