• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Collaborative mental health care program versus a general practitioner program and usual care for treatment of patients with mental or neurological disorders in Germany: protocol of a multiperspective evaluation study.协作式精神卫生保健计划与全科医生计划和常规护理治疗德国精神或神经障碍患者的比较:多视角评估研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1914-5.
2
Effectiveness of a coordinated ambulatory care program for patients with mental disorders or multiple sclerosis: results of a prospective non-randomized controlled trial in South Germany.针对精神障碍或多发性硬化症患者的协同门诊护理项目的有效性:德国南部一项前瞻性非随机对照试验的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 19;14:1183710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1183710. eCollection 2023.
3
The influence of cross-sectoral treatment models on patients with mental disorders in Germany: study protocol of a nationwide long-term evaluation study (EVA64).跨部门治疗模式对德国精神障碍患者的影响:一项全国范围长期评估研究(EVA64)的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 18;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1721-z.
4
How does the integration of collaborative care elements in a gatekeeping system affect the costs for mental health care in Germany?协作式护理要素融入守门人制度对德国精神卫生保健费用有何影响?
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):751-761. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01170-3. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
[PNP Program - Collaborative Mental and Neurological Health Care Program in Baden-Württemberg: Evaluation from the Perspective of Health Care Providers Enrolled in the Program].[巴登-符腾堡州的儿茶酚胺氧位甲基转移酶(PNP)项目——精神与神经健康协作护理项目:参与该项目的医疗服务提供者视角的评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 2020 Mar;47(2):71-78. doi: 10.1055/a-1043-7619. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Collaborative treatment of late-life depression in primary care (GermanIMPACT): study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.初级保健中晚期抑郁症的联合治疗(GermanIMPACT):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Sep 6;15:351. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-351.
7
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Evaluating a collaborative smoking cessation intervention in primary care (ENTER): study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.评估初级保健中的协作戒烟干预措施(ENTER):一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Oct 9;16:447. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0977-6.
10
Effectiveness and efficiency of integrated mental health care programmes in Germany: study protocol of an observational controlled trial.德国综合精神卫生保健项目的有效性和效率:一项观察性对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 4;14:163. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-163.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a coordinated ambulatory care program for patients with mental disorders or multiple sclerosis: results of a prospective non-randomized controlled trial in South Germany.针对精神障碍或多发性硬化症患者的协同门诊护理项目的有效性:德国南部一项前瞻性非随机对照试验的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 19;14:1183710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1183710. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of a depression care model for the hill tribes: a family and community-based participatory research.评估针对山地部落的抑郁关怀模式:基于家庭和社区的参与式研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 4;23(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05058-3.
3
Development of a model for shared care between general practice and mental healthcare: a protocol for a co-production study.共同照护模式在全科医疗与精神卫生保健之间的开发:一项共同生产研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e061575. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061575.
4
Depression treatment in Germany - using claims data to compare a collaborative mental health care program to the general practitioner program and usual care in terms of guideline adherence and need-oriented access to psychotherapy.德国的抑郁症治疗 - 使用索赔数据比较合作性心理健康护理计划与普通医生计划和常规护理在遵循指南和以需求为导向获得心理治疗方面的情况。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02995-1.
5
How does the integration of collaborative care elements in a gatekeeping system affect the costs for mental health care in Germany?协作式护理要素融入守门人制度对德国精神卫生保健费用有何影响?
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jul;21(5):751-761. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01170-3. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Effectiveness of a multimodal training programme to improve general practitioners' burnout, job satisfaction and psychological well-being.多模式培训计划对改善全科医生倦怠、工作满意度和心理健康的有效性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 12;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1036-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trials: A Requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.临床试验的数据共享声明:医学期刊编辑国际委员会的一项要求。
Rev Med Chil. 2017 Jun;145(6):691-693. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872017000600691.
2
Collaborative care for anxiety disorders in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗中焦虑症的协作护理:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jun 2;17:62. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0466-3.
3
Collaborative stepped care for somatoform disorders: A pre-post-intervention study in primary care.躯体形式障碍的协作式分步照护:一项初级保健中的干预前后研究。
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Jan;80:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
4
[psychenet - The Hamburg Network for Mental Health: Evaluation of the Health Network Depression from the Perspective of Participating General Practitioners, Psychotherapists and Psychiatrists].[心理网络 - 汉堡心理健康网络:从参与的全科医生、心理治疗师和精神科医生的角度对健康网络抑郁症进行评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 2015 Jul;42 Suppl 1:S54-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387688. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Stepped care for depression is easy to recommend, but harder to implement: results of an explorative study within primary care in the Netherlands.抑郁症的分级护理易于推荐,但实施起来却更难:荷兰初级保健领域一项探索性研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jan 9;15:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-5.
6
The somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8): a brief measure of somatic symptom burden.躯体症状量表 8 项版(SSS-8):一种躯体症状负担的简明测量工具。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):399-407. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12179.
7
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.混合方法实施研究中定性数据收集与分析的目的抽样法
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
8
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
9
Comparative effectiveness of collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions across primary, specialty, and behavioral health care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.协作式慢性病管理模式在初级保健、专科保健和行为保健环境下治疗心理健康状况的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;169(8):790-804. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111616.
10
Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis.协作式护理改善抑郁障碍管理效果的研究:社区指南系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 May;42(5):525-38. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019.

协作式精神卫生保健计划与全科医生计划和常规护理治疗德国精神或神经障碍患者的比较:多视角评估研究方案。

Collaborative mental health care program versus a general practitioner program and usual care for treatment of patients with mental or neurological disorders in Germany: protocol of a multiperspective evaluation study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Building W26, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1914-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-018-1914-5
PMID:30359248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6202836/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

German statutory health insurances are pursuing the goal of improving treatment of chronically ill people by promoting networks of health care providers and supporting treatments that reflect the current medical knowledge. The so-called PNP program is a collaborative care program developed by a German statutory health insurance, which defines specific rules on psychiatric, neurological, psychosomatic, and psychotherapeutic treatment. It aims to strengthen provision of guideline-based outpatient treatment and collaboration between different health care providers. It includes the general practitioners' program, which aims to strengthen the coordinating role of GPs. This study aims to evaluate the PNP program.

METHODS

To evaluate the effectiveness of the PNP program, we will conduct a prospective non-randomized controlled trial with primary data comparing patients enrolled in the PNP program and in the general practitioner program (intervention group) to patients enrolled only in the general practitioner program and patients who receive usual care (control groups). To evaluate costs and level of detail of diagnoses in care of patients with PNP program, we will use routinely collected secondary administrative health data in a retrospective quasi-experimental design. Patients who are at least 18 years old, insured by the statutory health insurance AOK, and on sick leave due to one of the mental or neurological diagnoses (affective, anxiety, somatoform or adjustment disorders, alcohol use disorders, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis) will be included. We will collect data at baseline and at 12-months follow-up. Health-related quality of life (primary data) and direct costs (secondary data) caused by outpatient and inpatient service utilization and medication will be the primary outcomes. We will analyze data using (generalized) linear mixed models and exploratory analyses. We will use entropy balancing to control for possible differences between the groups. We will use an exploratory sequential design including qualitative and descriptive statistical analyses to assess the structure and process quality of the PNP program among health care providers.

DISCUSSION

The results will help to develop a comprehensive picture of collaborative care programs for mental and neurological health care from the perspective of patients, health care providers, and health insurance companies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00013114.

摘要

背景

德国法定健康保险旨在通过促进医疗服务提供者网络并支持反映当前医学知识的治疗方法来改善慢性病患者的治疗效果。所谓的 PNP 计划是德国法定健康保险制定的一种协作护理计划,它对精神科、神经科、身心科和心理治疗规定了具体规则。该计划旨在加强基于指南的门诊治疗,并加强不同医疗服务提供者之间的合作。它包括全科医生计划,旨在加强全科医生的协调作用。本研究旨在评估 PNP 计划。

方法

为了评估 PNP 计划的效果,我们将进行一项前瞻性非随机对照试验,使用初级数据比较参加 PNP 计划和全科医生计划(干预组)的患者与仅参加全科医生计划和接受常规护理的患者(对照组)。为了评估 PNP 计划中患者护理的成本和诊断详细程度,我们将在回顾性准实验设计中使用常规收集的二级行政健康数据。纳入标准为年龄至少 18 岁、受法定健康保险 AOK 承保、因精神或神经诊断(情感、焦虑、躯体形式或适应障碍、酒精使用障碍、精神分裂症、多发性硬化症)而休病假的患者。我们将在基线和 12 个月随访时收集数据。健康相关生活质量(初级数据)和门诊和住院服务利用以及药物引起的直接成本(二级数据)将作为主要结果。我们将使用(广义)线性混合模型和探索性分析来分析数据。我们将使用熵平衡来控制组间可能存在的差异。我们将使用探索性序贯设计,包括定性和描述性统计分析,来评估医疗服务提供者中 PNP 计划的结构和过程质量。

讨论

结果将有助于从患者、医疗服务提供者和健康保险公司的角度全面了解精神和神经保健协作护理计划。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处 DRKS00013114。