Ghafur Abdul, Raza Muhammad, Labbett Wendy, Chawla Anuradha, Smith Colette, Ngui Siew Lin, Davenport Andrew, Geretti Anna Maria
Department of Virology, Royal Free Hospital and Royal Free & University College Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Sep;22(9):2640-4. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm202. Epub 2007 May 29.
It has been proposed that hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance haemodialysis may lack HCV antibody (anti-HCV) despite chronic HCV viraemia. This carries important implications for the design of surveillance policies.
To characterize the prevalence of antibody-negative/RNA-positive HCV infection, patients attending seven haemodialysis units underwent anti-HCV testing using a third-generation assay and HCV RNA testing using real-time PCR.
At screening, anti-HCV prevalence was 12/360 (3.3%; 95% CI 1.7-5.8%); 7/12 (58.3%) anti-HCV positive samples were HCV RNA positive. Among anti-HCV-negative samples, 2/348 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.2-2.1%) tested HCV RNA positive (genotype 1a). Retrospective testing of stored sera dated the infections to a period of holiday in the Indian subcontinent. The two infections were unrelated by HCV-NS5B sequencing. Only one of the two newly infected persons showed raised transaminases. Both developed anti-HCV within 8-13 weeks of follow-up. Prospective surveillance of travellers to resource-limited countries returning to the units showed a HCV incidence of 4/153 travel episodes (2.6%; 95% CI 0.7-6.6%) among 131 persons (3.1%; 95% CI 0.8-7.6%).
Among haemodialysis patients in the United Kingdom, antibody-negative/RNA-positive HCV status is associated with newly acquired infection, rather than lack of antibody responses in chronic HCV infection. There is a significant risk of HCV infection associated with travel to resource-limited countries. Given that transaminase levels may be normal, HCV RNA testing is recommended in patients re-entering a dialysis unit following haemodialysis in settings where suboptimal infection control policies pose a risk of exposure to blood-borne viruses.
有人提出,接受维持性血液透析的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染终末期肾病患者,尽管存在慢性HCV病毒血症,但可能缺乏HCV抗体(抗-HCV)。这对监测政策的设计具有重要意义。
为了确定抗体阴性/RNA阳性HCV感染的患病率,对7个血液透析单位的患者进行了第三代检测法抗-HCV检测以及实时PCR法HCV RNA检测。
筛查时,抗-HCV患病率为12/360(3.3%;95%可信区间1.7-5.8%);12份抗-HCV阳性样本中有7份(58.3%)HCV RNA呈阳性。在抗-HCV阴性样本中,2/348(0.6%;95%可信区间0.2-2.1%)检测HCV RNA呈阳性(基因型1a)。对储存血清的回顾性检测将感染时间追溯到印度次大陆的一个节假日期间。这两例感染通过HCV-NS5B测序显示无关联。两名新感染患者中只有一人转氨酶升高。两人在随访的8-13周内均产生了抗-HCV。对返回这些单位的前往资源有限国家的旅行者进行前瞻性监测显示,131人中有4/153次旅行发生HCV感染(2.6%;95%可信区间0.7-6.6%)(3.1%;95%可信区间0.8-7.6%)。
在英国的血液透析患者中,抗体阴性/RNA阳性HCV状态与新获得的感染有关,而非慢性HCV感染中缺乏抗体反应。前往资源有限国家旅行会带来显著的HCV感染风险。鉴于转氨酶水平可能正常,在感染控制政策欠佳存在血源病毒暴露风险的情况下,建议对在血液透析后重新进入透析单位的患者进行HCV RNA检测。