Wang Wen-Zhi, Jiang Bin, Wu Sheng-Ping, Hong Zhen, Yang Qi-Dong, Sander J W, Du Xiao-Li, Bao Qiu-Jiu
Department of Neuroepidemiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, PR China.
Neuroepidemiology. 2007;28(3):155-61. doi: 10.1159/000103268. Epub 2007 May 29.
Stroke has been the main cause of death in most urban residents in China since the 1990s. A community-based intervention trial carried out in China aimed to reduce the incidence and mortality of stroke. In 1991, two well-matched communities each with approximately 50,000 people were selected as intervention or control communities in the urban areas of Beijing, Shanghai and Changsha. Regular health education and health promotion activities were carried out between 1991 and 2000 in the intervention communities but no special action was taken in the control communities. Both fatal and nonfatal stroke cases were meticulously registered during the study in the two communities to assess the effect of long-term intervention. The trend in stroke incidence and the effect of intervention on stroke incidence were analyzed using a Poisson regression model adjusted for age, sex, year and city. Between 1991 and 2000, 2,273 first-ever stroke cases were registered in the intervention communities and 3,015 in the control communities. Geographic variation and changes in the incidence of stroke and its subtypes were found among these 3 cities. Through 10 years of intervention, incidence risks of all, ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes decreased by 11.4% (relative risk 0.8959; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.8483-0.9460; p < 0.0001), 13.2% (relative risk 0.8676; 95% CI 0.8054-0.9345; p = 0.0002) and 7.2% (relative risk 0.9283; 95% CI 0.8517-1.0117; p = 0.0899), respectively, in the intervention compared with control communities. Accordingly, comprehensive community-based intervention measures could effectively reduce the incidence of stroke in the population.
自20世纪90年代以来,中风一直是中国大多数城市居民的主要死因。在中国开展的一项基于社区的干预试验旨在降低中风的发病率和死亡率。1991年,在北京、上海和长沙的市区分别选取了两个匹配良好、各约有5万人的社区作为干预社区或对照社区。1991年至2000年期间,在干预社区开展了定期的健康教育和健康促进活动,而对照社区未采取特殊行动。在研究期间,对两个社区的致命性和非致命性中风病例都进行了详细登记,以评估长期干预的效果。使用经年龄、性别、年份和城市调整的泊松回归模型分析中风发病率趋势以及干预对中风发病率的影响。1991年至2000年期间,干预社区登记了2273例首次中风病例,对照社区登记了3015例。在这3个城市中发现了中风及其亚型发病率的地理差异和变化。经过10年的干预,与对照社区相比,干预社区中所有中风、缺血性中风和出血性中风的发病风险分别降低了11.4%(相对风险0.8959;95%置信区间,CI,0.8483 - 0.9460;p < 0.0001)、13.2%(相对风险0.8676;95% CI 0.8054 - 0.9345;p = 0.0002)和7.2%(相对风险0.9283;95% CI 0.8517 - 1.0117;p = 0.0899)。因此,基于社区的综合干预措施可以有效降低人群中风的发病率。