Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain.
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(12):761-70. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323120-00001.
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of amlodipine in two cohorts of hypertensive patients, one newly diagnosed and the other previously diagnosed but not controlled with drug therapy, and to assess the risk factors for the entire sample at the outset of the study.
We designed a postmarketing, multicentre, open-label, prospective, observational surveillance study with a 6-month follow-up, which included hypertensive patients (systolic blood pressure [SBP] >/=140mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >/=90mm Hg) who attended specialised units and had either newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed pharmacologically uncontrolled arterial hypertension.
Of the total of 1797 patients eligible for evaluation, 760 (42.3%) were newly and 1037 (57.7%) were previously diagnosed. Of these, 22.9% were classified as being in the high-risk and 43.2% in the very high-risk groups at the outset of the study (WHO-ISH [International Society of Hypertension]). On conclusion of the 6-month follow-up, 54.3% of newly diagnosed and 44.4% of previously treated patients had attained the BP therapy targets defined as SBP <140mm Hg and DBP <90mm Hg, representing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). A total of 8% of patients experienced some adverse event during the course of the study, with this percentage being somewhat higher in the previously treated than in the newly diagnosed group (10.8% vs 5.1%, p < 0.0001). Only 0.3% experienced some severe adverse event, although in no case was this linked to the drug under evaluation.
We conclude that amlodipine has shown itself to be an effective and safe drug for the control of hypertension, whether isolated or associated with other cardiovascular risk factors, both in patients without a previous diagnosis of arterial hypertension and in those previously diagnosed although not controlled under a prior treatment regimen.
评估氨氯地平在两组高血压患者中的疗效和安全性,一组为新诊断患者,另一组为既往诊断但药物治疗未控制的患者,并评估研究开始时整个样本的危险因素。
我们设计了一项上市后、多中心、开放标签、前瞻性、观察性监测研究,随访 6 个月,纳入了接受专科治疗的高血压患者(收缩压 [SBP]>/=140mmHg 和/或舒张压 [DBP]>/=90mmHg),这些患者要么新诊断为高血压,要么既往诊断为药物治疗未控制的高血压。
在符合评估条件的 1797 例患者中,760 例(42.3%)为新诊断,1037 例(57.7%)为既往诊断。其中,22.9%在研究开始时被归类为高危组,43.2%为极高危组(世界卫生组织-国际高血压学会 [WHO-ISH])。在 6 个月的随访结束时,54.3%的新诊断患者和 44.4%的既往治疗患者达到了定义的血压治疗目标,即 SBP<140mmHg 和 DBP<90mmHg,这是一个具有统计学意义的差异(p<0.0001)。在研究过程中,共有 8%的患者出现了一些不良事件,在既往治疗组中这一比例略高于新诊断组(10.8%比 5.1%,p<0.0001)。只有 0.3%的患者出现了一些严重的不良事件,但在任何情况下都与正在评估的药物无关。
我们得出结论,氨氯地平对于控制高血压是一种有效且安全的药物,无论是在没有既往高血压诊断的患者中,还是在既往诊断但在之前的治疗方案下未得到控制的患者中,无论是单纯高血压还是伴有其他心血管危险因素。