Suppr超能文献

8毫米金头、外部冲洗头和8毫米铂铱头导管用于腔静脉三尖瓣峡部消融的前瞻性随机对照研究。

Prospective randomized comparison of 8-mm gold-tip, externally irrigated-tip and 8-mm platinum-iridium tip catheters for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.

作者信息

Sacher Frédéric, O'Neill Mark D, Jais Pierre, Huffer Linda L, Laborderie Julien, Derval Nicolas, Deplagne Antoine, Takahashi Yoshihide, Jonnson Anders, Hocini Meleze, Clementy Jacques, Haissaguerre Michel

机构信息

Université Bordeaux II-Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Jul;18(7):709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00861.x. Epub 2007 May 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) can be performed using different types of ablation catheter. Gold tip electrodes have the theoretical advantage of creating bigger lesions than standard platinum-iridium electrode. This prospective, randomized study compares the clinical efficacy of 8-mm gold tip catheter, externally irrigated and 8-mm platinum-iridium tip (Pt tip) catheters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty consecutive patients (51 men, 60 +/- 10 years) undergoing de novo CTI ablation for documented typical atrial flutter were randomized to one of the following ablation catheters: 8-mm gold tip catheter, an externally irrigated-tip (Irr. tip) catheter, or an 8-mm Pt tip catheter. The procedural endpoint was achievement of bidirectional isthmus conduction block with < or = 20 minutes of RF energy application. The latter was achieved equally with the 3 catheters (95% for gold tip, 100% for irrigated tip, 95% for Pt tip) and the durations of RF (10 +/- 6, 10 +/- 4, 13 +/- 8 minutes), fluoroscopy (12 +/- 6, 12 +/- 7, 15 +/- 12 minutes) and the procedure (34 +/- 23, 38 +/- 24, 40 +/- 30 minutes) were similar in all groups. The maximal targeted power could not be reached in at least one location in 40% of patients with gold tip and in 35% of patients with Pt tip catheters whereas it was always achieved with an Irr. tip catheter (P = 0.003, P = 0.008). The reduction in impedance during RF delivery was greater with Irr. tip (11 +/- 7 ohms) than with gold (7 +/- 4 ohms, P = 0.02) or Pt tip (5 +/- 3 ohms, P = 0.001) catheters.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates equivalent efficacies of gold, platinum-iridium and externally Irr. tip catheters for successful de novo ablation of the CTI.

摘要

引言

可使用不同类型的消融导管对三尖瓣峡部(CTI)进行射频(RF)消融。金头电极在理论上具有比标准铂铱电极产生更大损伤灶的优势。这项前瞻性随机研究比较了8毫米金头导管、外部灌注导管和8毫米铂铱头(Pt头)导管的临床疗效。

方法与结果

连续60例(51例男性,年龄60±10岁)因记录到的典型心房扑动而接受初次CTI消融的患者被随机分配至以下消融导管之一:8毫米金头导管、外部灌注头(Irr.头)导管或8毫米Pt头导管。手术终点是在施加射频能量≤20分钟的情况下实现双向峡部传导阻滞。三种导管均能同样实现这一目标(金头导管为95%,灌注头导管为100%,Pt头导管为95%),且所有组的射频持续时间(10±6、10±4、13±8分钟)、透视时间(12±6、12±7、15±12分钟)和手术时间(34±23、38±24、40±30分钟)相似。40%使用金头导管的患者和35%使用Pt头导管的患者在至少一个部位无法达到最大目标功率,而使用Irr.头导管时总能达到最大目标功率(P = 0.003,P = 0.008)。与金头(7±4欧姆,P = 0.02)或Pt头(5±3欧姆,P = 0.001)导管相比,Irr.头导管在射频输送期间的阻抗降低更大(11±7欧姆)。

结论

本研究表明,金头、铂铱头和外部灌注头导管在初次成功消融CTI方面疗效相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验