Veit-Haibach P, Antoch G, Beyer T, Stergar H, Schleucher R, Hauth E A M, Bockisch A
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Br J Radiol. 2007 Jul;80(955):508-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/17395663. Epub 2007 May 30.
We aimed to compare the value of combined positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, PET+CT (viewed side by side), CT alone and PET alone concerning the rTNM stage and influence on therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer. 44 patients with suspicion of recurrent breast cancer underwent whole-body [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-PET/CT. Images of combined PET/CT, PET+CT, PET alone and CT alone were evaluated by four blinded reader teams. Diagnostic accuracies and influence on therapy were compared. Histology and a mean clinical follow up of 456 days served as the standard of reference. Differences between the staging procedures were tested for statistical significance by McNemar's test. Overall TNM tumour stage was correctly determined in 40/44 patients with PET/CT, in 38/44 with PET+CT, in 36/44 with PET alone and in 36/44 patients with CT alone. No statistically significant difference was detected between all tested imaging modalities. PET/CT changed the therapy in two patients compared with PET+CT, in four patients compared with PET alone and in five patients compared with CT alone. Combined PET/CT appeared to be more accurate in assessing the rTNM and showed a moderate impact on therapy over PET and CT. Minor improvements were noted when compared with PET+CT. Experienced readers might therefore be able to provide accurate staging results for further therapy from separately acquired studies.
我们旨在比较正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)联合检查、PET+CT(并排观察)、单纯CT及单纯PET在复发性乳腺癌患者rTNM分期及对治疗影响方面的价值。44例疑似复发性乳腺癌患者接受了全身[18F]-2-氟-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖(FDG)-PET/CT检查。联合PET/CT、PET+CT、单纯PET及单纯CT的图像由4个盲法阅片团队进行评估。比较诊断准确性及对治疗的影响。组织学检查及平均456天的临床随访作为参考标准。采用McNemar检验对分期程序之间的差异进行统计学显著性检验。PET/CT检查的44例患者中,40例正确确定了总体TNM肿瘤分期;PET+CT检查的44例患者中,38例正确确定;单纯PET检查的44例患者中,36例正确确定;单纯CT检查的44例患者中,36例正确确定。在所有检测的成像方式之间未检测到统计学显著差异。与PET+CT相比,PET/CT使2例患者的治疗方案发生改变;与单纯PET相比,使4例患者的治疗方案发生改变;与单纯CT相比,使5例患者的治疗方案发生改变。联合PET/CT在评估rTNM方面似乎更准确,且与PET和CT相比,对治疗有中度影响。与PET+CT相比有轻微改善。因此,经验丰富的阅片者或许能够从单独获取的研究中为进一步治疗提供准确的分期结果。