Pavlou Marousa, Davies Rosalyn A, Bronstein Adolfo M
Academic Department of Physiotherapy, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Kings College London, UK.
J Vestib Res. 2006;16(4-5):223-31.
Patients with chronic vestibular dysfunction often experience visually-induced aggravation of dizzy symptoms (visual vertigo; VV). The Situational Characteristics Questionnaire (SCQ), Computerized Dynamic Posturography or Rod and Frame Test (RFT) are used to assess VV symptoms. This study evaluates whether correlations exist between these three tests, their ability to identify patients with VV and whether emotional state correlates with VV symptoms. Tests were completed by 20 normal controls (Group NC), 20 patients with vestibular dysfunction plus VV (Group VV) and 13 without VV (Group NVV). Additionally, the Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS-V) was applied to quantify general, non-visually induced vertigo (dizziness, lightheadedness and/or spinning) and imbalance. Autonomic (VSS-A) and psychological symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire; HAD) were also assessed. With the SCQ 100% of Group VV scored outside normal ranges and scores differed significantly between Group VV and both Groups NC and NVV. RFT values were not significantly different between groups; only 15% of patients scored outside normal ranges. Posturography scores were abnormal for 50% of patients; significant differences were noted between Groups NC and VV for composite scores and ratios 3/1, 4/1, 5/1 and 6/1 (indicative of abnormal sensory re-weighting). There were no correlations between the three data sets in patients. Anxiety and depression scores significantly differed between Groups NC and VV but not between patient groups; this indicates that psychological symptoms may be present in either patient group. The SCQ can be used to corroborate an initial clinical diagnosis of VV and quantify its severity in patients with vestibular dysfunction. Posturography data suggested patients with VV have a sensory re-weighting abnormality. The rod and frame test results and posturography findings agree less with the clinical diagnosis of VV. Psychological symptoms may need to be addressed.
慢性前庭功能障碍患者常经历视觉诱发的头晕症状加重(视觉性眩晕;VV)。情境特征问卷(SCQ)、计算机化动态姿势描记法或视杆-视标试验(RFT)用于评估VV症状。本研究评估这三项测试之间是否存在相关性、它们识别VV患者的能力以及情绪状态是否与VV症状相关。20名正常对照者(NC组)、20名伴有VV的前庭功能障碍患者(VV组)和13名无VV的患者(NVV组)完成了测试。此外,应用眩晕症状量表(VSS-V)对一般的、非视觉诱发的眩晕(头晕、头昏和/或旋转感)及失衡进行量化。还评估了自主神经症状(VSS-A)和心理症状(医院焦虑抑郁量表;HAD)。SCQ显示,100%的VV组得分超出正常范围,且VV组与NC组和NVV组的得分差异显著。各组间RFT值无显著差异;仅15%的患者得分超出正常范围。姿势描记法得分在50%的患者中异常;NC组和VV组在综合得分及3/1、4/1、5/1和6/1比值(表明感觉重加权异常)方面存在显著差异。患者的这三个数据集之间无相关性。NC组和VV组的焦虑和抑郁得分存在显著差异,但患者组之间无差异;这表明心理症状可能在任一患者组中出现。SCQ可用于证实VV的初步临床诊断并量化前庭功能障碍患者的病情严重程度。姿势描记法数据表明,VV患者存在感觉重加权异常。视杆-视标试验结果和姿势描记法结果与VV的临床诊断一致性较差。可能需要关注心理症状。