Marsden Jonathan, Dennett Rachel, Gibbon Angela, Knight Lozano Rachel, Freeman Jennifer A, Bamiou Doris-Eva, Harris Chris, Hawton Annie, Goodwin Elizabeth, Creanor Siobhan, Sorrell Lexy, Hoskings Joanne, Pavlou Marousa
School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Science, Intercity Place, Plymouth, UK.
EAR Institute University College London, London, UK.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Sep;39(9):687-700. doi: 10.1177/15459683251345444. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
Vestibular dysfunction occurs in 30% to 70% of cases with multiple sclerosis (MS).
To compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a customized vestibular rehabilitation (VR) program with a generic booklet-based VR intervention in people with MS with clinical signs of vestibulopathy.
People with MS and symptoms of vertigo and/or imbalance were screened for vestibulopathy (n = 73). Seventy recruited participants were randomly allocated to a 12-week generic booklet-based home program with telephone support (n = 35) or a 12-week customized VR program (n = 35, 12 face-to-face sessions and a home exercise program). The primary clinical outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) at 26 weeks post-randomization. The primary economic endpoint was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Secondary outcomes included vertigo severity, balance, gait, and perceived impact of physical symptoms in MS.
There was no significant between-group difference in the DHI: mean reduction -1.76 (95% confidence interval -10.02, 6.50) at week 26 in favor of the customized group ( = .670). There were significant differences in favor of the customized group for vertigo symptom score, balance confidence, walking, and perceived impact of MS. Primary cost-effectiveness analysis showed customized VR to be less costly and more effective. However, removal of 2 cost outliers in sensitivity analysis resulted in a mean cost-per-QALY of £30 147. Customized VR was also cost-effective from a societal perspective.
Impairment level improvements did not translate into functional improvements as measured by the DHI perhaps reflecting that vestibular dysfunction is one of several impairments in MS. The findings indicate the potential cost-effectiveness of the customized program.
ISRCTN27374299.
30%至70%的多发性硬化症(MS)患者会出现前庭功能障碍。
比较定制的前庭康复(VR)方案与基于通用手册的VR干预措施对有前庭病变临床体征的MS患者的临床效果和成本效益。
对有眩晕和/或失衡症状的MS患者进行前庭病变筛查(n = 73)。70名招募的参与者被随机分配到一个为期12周、基于通用手册且有电话支持的家庭方案组(n = 35)或一个为期12周的定制VR方案组(n = 35,12次面对面治疗和一个家庭锻炼方案)。主要临床结局是随机分组后26周时的头晕残障量表(DHI)。主要经济终点是质量调整生命年(QALY)。次要结局包括眩晕严重程度、平衡能力、步态以及MS患者身体症状的感知影响。
DHI在组间无显著差异:在第26周时,定制组的平均降低值为-1.76(95%置信区间-10.02,6.50),有利于定制组(P = 0.670)。在眩晕症状评分、平衡信心、行走以及MS的感知影响方面,定制组有显著优势。主要成本效益分析表明,定制VR成本更低且更有效。然而,敏感性分析中去除2个成本异常值后,每QALY的平均成本为30147英镑。从社会角度来看,定制VR也具有成本效益。
如DHI所测,损伤水平的改善并未转化为功能改善,这可能反映出前庭功能障碍是MS中的多种损伤之一。研究结果表明定制方案具有潜在的成本效益。
ISRCTN27374299。