Suppr超能文献

胆管癌纵向肿瘤范围的评估:在未增强图像和磁共振胆胰管造影基础上增加钆增强动态成像的价值

Evaluation of the longitudinal tumor extent of bile duct cancer: value of adding gadolinium-enhanced dynamic imaging to unenhanced images and magnetic resonance cholangiography.

作者信息

Kim Hyuk Jung, Lee Jeong Min, Kim Se Hyung, Han Joon Koo, Lee Jae Young, Choi Jin Young, Kim Ki Hyun, Kim Ji Yang, Lee Min Woo, Kim Su Jin, Choi Byung Ihn

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 May-Jun;31(3):469-74. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000238011.42060.b5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the added value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) images compared with unenhanced and MR cholangiography (MRC) images, to evaluate the longitudinal extension of bile duct cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Thirty-three patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma or common duct cancer who had undergone MRC, unenhanced, and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images and surgery were included in this study. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed 2 image sets in 2 steps, that is, the MRC set (unenhanced and MRC) and the combined image set (MRC set with dynamic images). At each step, the readers determined the tumor status according to the Bismuth-Corlette classification. The readers assigned their confidence levels on a 5-point scale regarding whether the tumor involved the secondary confluence of the bile duct and the intrapancreatic common bile duct. The radiologists' diagnostic confidence of the 2 image sets was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed higher areas under the curve values when the combined image set was interpreted (0.990 +/- 0.017 for reader 1 and 0.951 +/- 0.027 for reader 2) than when the MRC set was interpreted (0.982 +/- 0.017 for reader 1 and 0.902 +/- 0.038 for reader 2); however, the difference was not statistically significant for either reader (P > 0.05). In addition, regarding evaluation of the tumor status according to the Bismuth-Corlette classification, the overall accuracy was higher for the combined image set than for the MRC set alone, but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). When dynamic images were added to the MRC images, interobserver agreement improved from 0.72 to 0.84.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of contrast-enhanced dynamic images to unenhanced and MRC images did not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy for assessment of the longitudinal extent of bile duct cancer.

摘要

目的

确定钆增强动态磁共振(MR)图像相较于未增强及磁共振胰胆管造影(MRC)图像在评估胆管癌纵向延伸方面的附加价值。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了33例接受过MRC、未增强及钆增强动态MR成像检查并接受手术的肝门部胆管癌或胆总管癌患者。两名经验丰富的放射科医生分两步独立评估两组图像,即MRC组(未增强及MRC图像)和联合图像组(MRC组加动态图像)。在每一步中,阅片者根据Bismuth-Corlette分类确定肿瘤状态。阅片者就肿瘤是否累及胆管二级汇合处及胰内段胆总管给出5分制的置信度。使用受试者操作特征分析来分析放射科医生对两组图像的诊断置信度。

结果

受试者操作特征分析显示,解读联合图像组时曲线下面积值更高(阅片者1为0.990±0.017,阅片者2为0.951±0.027),高于解读MRC组时(阅片者1为0.982±0.017,阅片者2为0.902±0.038);然而,对于任一阅片者,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,根据Bismuth-Corlette分类评估肿瘤状态时,联合图像组的总体准确率高于单独的MRC组,但差异不显著(P>0.05)。当将动态图像添加到MRC图像中时,观察者间一致性从0.72提高到了0.84。

结论

在未增强及MRC图像基础上添加对比增强动态图像,对于评估胆管癌纵向范围的诊断准确性并无显著提高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验