Trakarnvanich Veeraphong
Department of Pathology, BMA General Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2007 Jan;38(1):78-81.
This study compared Giemsa (GM) and methylene blue (MB) stains for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Gastric biopsy specimens obtained from January 2001 to December 2005 were reviewed. They were all stained with hematoxylin and eosin, GM and MB stains. The slides were examined on a blinded basis. Direct comparisons were made between the both stains. Two hundred thirty-six cases were studied with a concordance rate of 98.3% (Kappa value = 0.951, p < 0.05), showing good agreement. MB stain can be substituted for GM stain, and is preferred because it is cost-effective, less time-consuming, less complicated to perform, accurate and widely available. Useful hints to reduce false negativity with MB stain are discussed.
本研究比较了吉姆萨(GM)染色和亚甲蓝(MB)染色在诊断幽门螺杆菌方面的效果。回顾了2001年1月至2005年12月期间获取的胃活检标本。所有标本均进行苏木精-伊红染色、GM染色和MB染色。玻片在盲法下进行检查。对两种染色进行了直接比较。共研究了236例病例,一致性率为98.3%(Kappa值 = 0.951,p < 0.05),显示出良好的一致性。MB染色可替代GM染色,且因其具有成本效益、耗时较少、操作不太复杂、准确且易于获得而更受青睐。文中还讨论了减少MB染色假阴性的有用提示。