Narahari S R, Ryan T J, Mahadevan P E, Bose K S, Prasanna K S
Institute of Applied Dermatology, Kasaragod, India.
Lymphology. 2007 Mar;40(1):3-13.
The Global Alliance for the Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (GAELF) has recommended exploring local health traditions of skin care and a low cost treatment paradigm for rural communities has been proposed by Vaqas and Ryan. Our case study incorporates these promising treatments for use in treating filariasis in rural communities. Patients having lymphedema of one or both lower limbs (skin: normal, thickened or with trophic/warty changes) received treatment components from ayurveda, yoga and biomedicine simultaneously: including soap wash, phanta soaking, Indian manual lymph drainage (IMLD), pre- and post-IMLD yoga exercises, and compression using bandages for 194 days, along with diet restrictions and oral herbal medicines indicated for "elephantiasis" in Ayurveda. Entry points when infected were treated with biomedical drugs. The study was conducted in the reverse pharmacology design. 112 patients and 149 lower limbs completed 194 days of treatment during 2003-2006. Significant improvements were observed in the limb circumference measurements and the frequency of acute dermatolymphangioadenitis, use of preventive antibiotics, and reduction in the number of entry points were also improved. The objective to obtain significant benefit for a common problem using locally available, sustainable and affordable means has been achieved. It has not been our purpose to show that the regimen employed is better than another but the results do pose the question--"Are there components of Ayurvedic medicine that deserve further study?" It is important to understand that the regimen has been delivered mostly at home and that participants we have treated, representing a population suffering from a common problem, have not had access to effective conservative therapy that is culturally acceptable, safe, and efficacious.
全球消除淋巴丝虫病联盟(GAELF)建议探索当地的皮肤护理健康传统,Vaqas和Ryan提出了一种针对农村社区的低成本治疗模式。我们的案例研究纳入了这些有前景的治疗方法,用于农村社区的丝虫病治疗。患有单侧或双侧下肢淋巴水肿(皮肤:正常、增厚或有营养性/疣状改变)的患者同时接受了阿育吠陀医学、瑜伽和生物医学的治疗:包括肥皂清洗、药水浸泡、印度手法淋巴引流(IMLD)、IMLD前后的瑜伽练习,以及使用绷带加压194天,同时遵循饮食限制并服用阿育吠陀医学中针对“象皮病”的口服草药。感染时的入口点用生物医学药物治疗。该研究采用反向药理学设计。在2003年至2006年期间,112名患者和149条下肢完成了194天的治疗。观察到肢体周长测量值有显著改善,急性皮肤淋巴管炎的频率、预防性抗生素的使用以及入口点数量的减少也有所改善。通过使用当地可得、可持续且负担得起的方法,为一个常见问题取得显著益处的目标已经实现。我们的目的不是表明所采用的治疗方案比另一种更好,但结果确实提出了一个问题——“阿育吠陀医学的成分是否值得进一步研究?”重要的是要明白,该治疗方案大多是在患者家中实施的,而且我们所治疗的参与者,代表了患有常见问题的人群,此前无法获得文化上可接受、安全且有效的保守治疗。