Berger Alan K, Duval Sue, Manske Connie, Vazquez Gabriela, Barber Cheryl, Miller Leslie, Luepker Russell V
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of MN, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
Am Heart J. 2007 Jun;153(6):1064-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.017.
Patients with coexistent heart failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a poor prognosis, possibly related to the underuse of standard medical therapies--angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).
We performed a retrospective analysis of the Minnesota Heart Survey, identifying patients hospitalized in 2000 in the Minneapolis-St Paul metropolitan area with heart failure. The main outcome measure was the association of ACE-I and ARB use on 30-day and 1-year mortality, stratified by glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
Compared to patients with heart failure with preserved renal function (GFR > or = 90 mL/min), patients with severely impaired renal function (GFR <15 mL/min) were far less likely to receive ACE-I or ARB during hospitalization (52.0% vs 69.5%, P < .0001) or at discharge (50.5% vs 65.1%, P < .0001). Worsening renal function was associated with increased mortality, both at 30 days and at 1 year. The inhospital use of either an ACE-I or ARB was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.59) after adjusting for multiple risk factors. Similarly, the discharge prescription of either an ACE-I or ARB was associated with a significant reduction in adjusted 1-year mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.91). However, among patients on dialysis, there was no benefit of ACE-I or ARB on either 30-day or 1-year mortality.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and ARB are underused in patients with heart failure with chronic kidney disease. Given the reduction in 30-day and 1-year mortality, these medications should be considered in most patients with heart failure, independent of underlying renal function. Among patients on hemodialysis, further investigation is warranted.
合并心力衰竭和慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患者预后较差,这可能与标准药物治疗(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂[ACE-I]和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂[ARB])使用不足有关。
我们对明尼苏达心脏调查进行了回顾性分析,确定了2000年在明尼阿波利斯 - 圣保罗大都市地区因心力衰竭住院的患者。主要结局指标是根据肾小球滤过率(GFR)分层,ACE-I和ARB的使用与30天和1年死亡率的关联。
与肾功能正常的心力衰竭患者(GFR≥90 mL/分钟)相比,肾功能严重受损的患者(GFR<15 mL/分钟)在住院期间(52.0%对69.5%,P<0.0001)或出院时(50.5%对65.1%,P<0.0001)接受ACE-I或ARB的可能性要小得多。肾功能恶化与30天和1年时死亡率增加相关。在调整多个危险因素后,住院期间使用ACE-I或ARB与30天死亡率显著降低相关(OR 0.45,95%CI 0.28 - 0.59)。同样,ACE-I或ARB的出院处方与调整后的1年死亡率显著降低相关(OR 0.72,95%CI 0.58 - 0.91)。然而,在透析患者中,ACE-I或ARB对30天或1年死亡率均无益处。
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和ARB在合并慢性肾脏病的心力衰竭患者中使用不足。鉴于30天和1年死亡率降低,大多数心力衰竭患者无论基础肾功能如何都应考虑使用这些药物。对于血液透析患者,有必要进行进一步研究。