• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过试验注册减少发表偏倚。

Reducing publication bias through trial registration.

作者信息

Abaid Lisa N, Grimes David A, Schulz Kenneth F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7570, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a.

DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a
PMID:17540818
Abstract

Publication bias is the systematic, preferential publication of studies with statistically significant positive results over indeterminate studies (frequently, researchers inappropriately term these "negative" studies), or studies that show a statistically significant negative outcome. Over time, this practice distorts the medical literature, potentially compromising the validity of systematic reviews. Publication bias primarily stems from investigators, but data suppression can occur by pharmaceutical companies, universities, and regulatory agencies. Registration at inception of all clinical trials in a centralized, searchable database can reduce publication bias by enabling researchers to identify all studies related to a particular intervention. Prior attempts to encourage voluntary trial registration have been largely unsuccessful. Hence, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors recently adopted a policy of mandatory clinical trial registration before consideration of manuscripts for publication. Trial registration and the development of comprehensive, computerized databases will promote transparency in research and help reduce publication bias.

摘要

发表偏倚是指系统地、优先发表具有统计学显著阳性结果的研究,而不是不确定的研究(研究人员常常不恰当地将这些研究称为“阴性”研究),或者是显示出统计学显著阴性结果的研究。随着时间的推移,这种做法会扭曲医学文献,可能损害系统评价的有效性。发表偏倚主要源于研究人员,但制药公司、大学和监管机构也可能进行数据压制。在一个集中的、可搜索的数据库中对所有临床试验进行初始注册,通过使研究人员能够识别与特定干预措施相关的所有研究,可以减少发表偏倚。此前鼓励自愿试验注册的尝试大多没有成功。因此,国际医学期刊编辑委员会最近采用了一项政策,即在考虑发表稿件之前强制进行临床试验注册。试验注册以及全面的计算机化数据库的开发将促进研究的透明度,并有助于减少发表偏倚。

相似文献

1
Reducing publication bias through trial registration.通过试验注册减少发表偏倚。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a.
2
Reducing publication bias of prospective clinical trials through trial registration.通过试验注册减少前瞻性临床试验的发表偏倚。
Contraception. 2007 Nov;76(5):339-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.013.
3
Tackling publication bias and selective reporting in health informatics research: register your eHealth trials in the International eHealth Studies Registry.应对健康信息学研究中的发表偏倚和选择性报告:在国际电子健康研究注册中心注册您的电子健康试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 30;6(3):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e35.
4
Reporting, access, and transparency: better infrastructure of clinical trials.报告、获取与透明度:更好的临床试验基础设施
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S178-83. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819207bb.
5
Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.急性中风临床试验报告中发表偏倚的证据。
Neurology. 2006 Sep 26;67(6):973-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237331.16541.ac.
6
[Research results should be freely accessible!-- Case reports demonstrate obstacles to contact with drug industry].[研究成果应免费获取!——病例报告显示与制药行业接触存在障碍]
Lakartidningen. 2001 Sep 12;98(37):3913-6.
7
The need for trial identifiers.试验标识符的必要性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(2):203-6. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002883.
8
Review articles and publication bias.综述文章与发表偏倚。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 May;42(5):587-91.
9
[Registration of clinical trials: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors].[临床试验注册:国际医学期刊编辑委员会声明]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Sep 18;148(38):1870-1.
10
Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others.德国某医学院的临床研究项目:从伦理批准到发表及被他人引用的跟踪研究。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep;34(9):e20. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024521.

引用本文的文献

1
The scientific chaos phase of the great pandemic: A longitudinal analysis and systematic review of the first surge of clinical research concerning COVID-19.大流行的科学混沌阶段:对 COVID-19 首批临床研究的纵向分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0289193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289193. eCollection 2023.
2
Public disclosure of clinical trial results at Clinical Trial Registry of India- Need for transparency in research!印度临床试验注册中心对临床试验结果的公开披露——研究需要透明度!
Perspect Clin Res. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):81-85. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_39_22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
Empirical assessment of fragility index based on a large database of clinical studies in the Cochrane Library.
基于 Cochrane 图书馆中大量临床研究数据库的脆性指数的实证评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Mar;29(2):359-370. doi: 10.1111/jep.13787. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
4
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.评估临床试验和荟萃分析结果的稳健性:脆弱指数方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Potential publication bias in chiropractic and spinal manipulation research listed on clinicaltrials.gov.ClinicalTrials.gov上列出的整脊疗法和脊柱推拿研究中的潜在发表偏倚。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2020 Apr;64(1):82-87.
6
Clinical trial registration, and publication in acupuncture studies: A systematic review.针灸研究中的临床试验注册与发表:一项系统综述
Integr Med Res. 2020 Mar;9(1):56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
7
What happens to intimate partner violence studies registered on clinicaltrials.gov? A systematic review of a clinical trials registry.在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册的亲密伴侣暴力研究有何结果?一项临床试验注册库的系统评价。
Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3412-6.
8
Clinical Trials Registry - India: An overview and new developments.印度临床试验注册:概述与新进展
Indian J Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Aug;50(4):208-211. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_153_18.
9
Probiotics in the treatment of periodontal disease: A systematic review.益生菌在牙周病治疗中的应用:一项系统综述。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Sep-Oct;20(5):488-495. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.207053.
10
Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews.应对发表偏倚干预措施的障碍与促进因素:学术文章及利益相关者访谈的主题分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 13;14:551. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0551-z.