• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估临床试验和荟萃分析结果的稳健性:脆弱指数方法。

Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053
PMID:36084702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9974556/
Abstract

The fragility index has been increasingly used to assess the robustness of the results of clinical trials since 2014. It aims at finding the smallest number of event changes that could alter originally statistically significant results. Despite its popularity, some researchers have expressed several concerns about the validity and usefulness of the fragility index. It offers a comprehensive review of the fragility index's rationale, calculation, software, and interpretation, with emphasis on application to studies in obstetrics and gynecology. This article presents the fragility index in the settings of individual clinical trials, standard pairwise meta-analyses, and network meta-analyses. Moreover, this article provides worked examples to demonstrate how the fragility index can be appropriately calculated and interpreted. In addition, the limitations of the traditional fragility index and some solutions proposed in the literature to address these limitations were reviewed. In summary, the fragility index is recommended to be used as a supplemental measure in the reporting of clinical trials and a tool to communicate the robustness of trial results to clinicians. Other considerations that can aid in the fragility index's interpretation include the loss to follow-up and the likelihood of data modifications that achieve the loss of statistical significance.

摘要

自 2014 年以来,脆弱指数越来越多地被用于评估临床试验结果的稳健性。它旨在找到最小数量的事件变化,这些变化可能会改变最初具有统计学意义的结果。尽管它很受欢迎,但一些研究人员对脆弱指数的有效性和有用性表示了一些担忧。本文全面回顾了脆弱指数的原理、计算、软件和解释,重点介绍了在妇产科研究中的应用。本文还介绍了脆弱指数在个体临床试验、标准成对荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析中的应用。此外,本文还提供了示例来说明如何正确计算和解释脆弱指数。此外,还回顾了传统脆弱指数的局限性以及文献中提出的一些解决这些局限性的方法。总之,建议在临床试验报告中使用脆弱指数作为补充措施,并将其作为向临床医生传达试验结果稳健性的工具。其他有助于解释脆弱指数的考虑因素包括随访损失和数据修改的可能性,这些修改可能会导致失去统计学意义。

相似文献

1
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.评估临床试验和荟萃分析结果的稳健性:脆弱指数方法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package.使用 fragility 包在 R 中评估和可视化二项结果临床结果的脆弱性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268754. eCollection 2022.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Fragility index of network meta-analysis with application to smoking cessation data.网络荟萃分析的脆弱性指数及其在戒烟数据中的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Factors that impact fragility index and their visualizations.影响脆弱性指数的因素及其可视化。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;27(2):356-364. doi: 10.1111/jep.13428. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
6
The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses.荟萃分析的统计学意义通常很脆弱:荟萃分析脆弱指数的定义。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
7
The Role of Double-Zero-Event Studies in Evidence Synthesis: Evaluating Robustness Using the Fragility Index.双零事件研究在证据综合中的作用:使用脆弱性指数评估稳健性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14301. doi: 10.1111/jep.14301.
8
Assessing fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacological therapies for opioid use disorders: a systematic review.评估评估阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的随机对照试验中统计学显著发现的脆弱性:系统评价。
Trials. 2024 Apr 27;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08104-x.
9
The fragility of statistical findings in distal biceps tendon repairs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.远端肱二头肌腱修复术的统计学结果的脆弱性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Aug;32(8):e379-e386. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
10
The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials.多中心随机对照重症监护试验中的脆弱性指数
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1278-84. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001670.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics.关于量化可重复性指标的范围综述:众多问题催生众多指标。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jul 15;12(7):242076. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242076. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Water-soluble contrast agents in adhesional small bowel obstruction: meta-analysis and PRECIS-2 assessment of trials.粘连性小肠梗阻中的水溶性造影剂:试验的荟萃分析和PRECIS-2评估
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf049.
3
The Role of Double-Zero-Event Studies in Evidence Synthesis: Evaluating Robustness Using the Fragility Index.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing and visualizing fragility of clinical results with binary outcomes in R using the fragility package.使用 fragility 包在 R 中评估和可视化二项结果临床结果的脆弱性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268754. eCollection 2022.
2
Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study.数据提取在不良事件证据综合实践中的有效性:再现性研究。
BMJ. 2022 May 10;377:e069155. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069155.
3
Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results.
双零事件研究在证据综合中的作用:使用脆弱性指数评估稳健性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14301. doi: 10.1111/jep.14301.
4
Fragility in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials with primary continuous outcomes (2018-2022) from multi-perspectives assessment: a cross-sectional survey.多视角评估2018 - 2022年主要连续性结局的心血管随机对照试验中的脆弱性:一项横断面调查
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2427909. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2427909. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
5
Beyond the Fragility Index.超越脆弱性指数。
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2452. doi: 10.1002/pst.2452. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
6
Robustness Assessment of Oncology Dose-Finding Trials Using the Modified Fragility Index.使用修正的脆弱性指数对肿瘤学剂量探索试验进行稳健性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;16(20):3504. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203504.
7
Tipping point analysis for the between-arm correlation in an arm-based evidence synthesis.基于手臂的证据综合中臂间相关性的临界点分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02263-w.
8
Exploring the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology: a systematic review.探索眼科学中荟萃分析的脆弱性:系统评价。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Nov;38(16):3153-3160. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03255-2. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
9
The Fragility of Landmark Randomized Controlled Trials in the Plastic Surgery Literature.整形外科学术文献中标志性随机对照试验的脆弱性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jan 17;12(1):e5352. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005352. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Non-Pharmacological Strategies and Interventions for Effective COVID-19 Control: A Narrative Review.有效控制新冠病毒的非药物策略与干预措施:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 11;12(20):6465. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206465.
儿科外科试验、脆弱指数及其为何应避免用于评估结果
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jul;38(7):1057-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05133-y. Epub 2022 May 7.
4
Cerclage placement in twin pregnancies with short or dilated cervix does not prevent preterm birth: a fragility index assessment.宫颈短或扩张的双胎妊娠中进行宫颈环扎术并不能预防早产:一项脆弱性指数评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):338-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Thresholds for interpreting the fragility index derived from sample of randomised controlled trials in cardiology: a meta-epidemiologic study.从随机对照试验样本中得出的脆性指数的解释阈值:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Apr;28(2):133-136. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111858. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacologic interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.药物干预预防乙型肝炎病毒母婴传播的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.042. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
7
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Gynaecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review.妇科手术中统计学显著结果的脆弱性:系统评价。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 May;44(5):508-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Fragility indices for only sufficiently likely modifications.仅针对极有可能发生的修饰的脆性指数。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 7;118(49). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105254118.
9
On clinical trial fragility due to patients lost to follow up.由于患者失访导致的临床试验脆弱性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01446-z.
10
The fragility index can be used for sample size calculations in clinical trials.脆性指数可用于临床试验的样本量计算。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 15.