Suppr超能文献

股浅动脉闭塞性疾病患者致残性间歇性跛行的治疗——决策分析

The treatment of disabling intermittent claudication in patients with superficial femoral artery occlusive disease--decision analysis.

作者信息

Nolan Brian, Finlayson Samuel, Tosteson Anna, Powell Richard, Cronenwett Jack

机构信息

Center for Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Division of Vascular Surgery Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the preferred approach to superficial femoral artery (SFA) revascularization of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Societal Consensus (TASC) B and C lesions in claudicants requiring intervention based on a review of published data.

DESIGN

Decision analysis, Markov state transition model.

SUBJECTS

Hypothetical cohorts of claudicants with TASC B or TASC C superficial femoral artery lesions considered candidates for either angioplasty with selective stenting (PTA/S) or greater saphenous vein bypass (GSVB).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Quality adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

For a 65-year-old man with disabling claudication, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and selective stenting (PTA/S) was preferred over GSVB for a TASC B SFA lesion. In an otherwise identical patient with a TASC C lesion, bypass was the preferred therapy. Treating PTA/S failures with subsequent bypass increased the utility of PTA/S but bypass remained the preferred initial therapy for TASC C lesions. Sensitivity analysis showed that PTA/S surpasses bypass efficacy for TASC C lesions if PTA/S primary patency is >32% at 5 years, patient age is >80 years, or GSVB operative mortality is >6%.

CONCLUSION

PTA/S is the preferred initial therapy over GSVB for TASC B SFA lesions in patients with disabling intermittent claudication who require intervention. Given contemporary published outcomes for TASC C lesions, GSVB is the preferred therapy in operative candidates. In elderly patients or patients at high risk for bypass, PTA/S should be considered over GSVB. Improved technology that results in a 5-year primary patency of 32% would also justify PTA/S for TASC C SFA lesions.

摘要

目的

基于对已发表数据的回顾,确定对于需要干预的间歇性跛行患者,跨大西洋两岸心血管外科学会(TASC)B级和C级股浅动脉(SFA)病变进行血运重建的首选方法。

设计

决策分析、马尔可夫状态转移模型。

研究对象

假设患有TASC B级或C级股浅动脉病变的间歇性跛行患者队列,这些患者被认为是血管成形术联合选择性支架置入术(PTA/S)或大隐静脉旁路移植术(GSVB)的候选者。

主要观察指标

质量调整生命年(QALYs)。

结果

对于一名65岁的重度间歇性跛行男性患者,对于TASC B级SFA病变,经皮腔内血管成形术联合选择性支架置入术(PTA/S)优于GSVB。在其他方面相同但患有TASC C级病变的患者中,旁路移植术是首选治疗方法。用后续的旁路移植术治疗PTA/S失败病例可提高PTA/S的效用,但旁路移植术仍是TASC C级病变的首选初始治疗方法。敏感性分析表明,如果PTA/S在5年时的初始通畅率>32%、患者年龄>80岁或GSVB手术死亡率>6%,则PTA/S对于TASC C级病变的疗效超过旁路移植术。

结论

对于需要干预的重度间歇性跛行患者,PTA/S是TASC B级SFA病变优于GSVB的首选初始治疗方法。鉴于目前已发表的TASC C级病变的治疗结果,对于适合手术的患者,GSVB是首选治疗方法。对于老年患者或旁路移植术高风险患者,应考虑PTA/S而非GSVB。如果技术改进能使5年初始通畅率达到32%,那么PTA/S对于TASC C级SFA病变也是合理的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验