• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规和选择性支架血管成形术腔内治疗后股浅动脉再狭窄的模式。

Patterns of femoropopliteal recurrence after routine and selective stenting endoluminal therapy.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;57(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.097. Epub 2012 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.097
PMID:22975333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4027047/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the incidence and characteristics of recurrent disease after femoropopliteal angioplasty, following either selective or routine stenting of diseased site(s).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database for femoropopliteal interventions from June 2003 to July 2010 was performed. Interventions during this period were from a single institution, followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months after initial intervention and on a semiannual basis thereafter with clinical examinations and duplex ultrasound imaging. Two groups were identified: those with routine stenting (RS; routine stenting for all diseased areas) and those with selective stenting (SS; selective stenting for only segments which exhibited compromised flow from residual stenosis or significant dissection). Patients who developed recurrent symptoms (claudication, rest pain), a decrease in ankle-brachial index (ABI) (>0.2), or duplex documentation of a significant (>80%) recurrent stenosis underwent reintervention. Patient demographics, comorbidities, Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification, runoff, and degree of calcification (none, mild, moderate, severe) at initial intervention were recorded. The time to reintervention and recurrence pattern were recorded for both groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 746 endovascular interventions in 477 patients were performed. Total reintervention rate, including bypass, amputation, and asymptomatic occlusion after initial intervention, was 36.48% (group SS, 42.9%; group RS, 33.1%; P=.04). Of all initial interventions, 182 endovascular reinterventions in 165 patients for recurrent femoropopliteal disease were identified (group SS, 70; group RS, 95). No differences were noted among the groups in gender, comorbidities, initial TASC II classification, run off, calcification scores, or statin or clopidogrel use, or both. Time to recurrence was similar in the RS and SS groups. TASC II classification, runoff score, and degree of calcification were similar between the two groups. Although not statistically significant, analysis of recurrence pattern demonstrated de novo stenosis was more common in the SS group (50.0% vs 34.7%; P=.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center retrospective study found a significant difference in the incidence of recurrence requiring reintervention between patients treated with selective and routine stenting for femoropopliteal disease. Analysis of endovascular reinterventions, however, reveals no significant difference in recurrence time or recurrence pattern between the two groups. No significant differences were identified in time to recurrence, TASC II classification, runoff, and calcification of endovascular reinterventions between the two groups' end points. Additional prospective studies to evaluate the roles of routine and selective stenting in symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease and to investigate recurrence lesion characteristics and the patency of multiple endovascular interventions between these two groups are needed.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f22/4027047/f30f8c0db5e9/nihms448176f1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f22/4027047/f30f8c0db5e9/nihms448176f1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f22/4027047/f30f8c0db5e9/nihms448176f1a.jpg
摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定选择性或常规病变部位支架置入后股腘动脉成形术后复发疾病的发生率和特征。

方法

对 2003 年 6 月至 2010 年 7 月期间股腘动脉介入治疗的前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。该期间的介入治疗均来自单一机构,在初次介入治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月以及此后每半年进行临床检查和双功能超声检查。将患者分为两组:常规支架置入组(RS;对所有病变部位进行常规支架置入)和选择性支架置入组(SS;仅对残余狭窄或严重夹层导致血流受损的节段进行选择性支架置入)。出现复发症状(跛行、静息痛)、踝肱指数(ABI)下降(>0.2)或双功能超声显示有明显(>80%)再狭窄的患者需要进行再次介入治疗。记录患者的人口统计学资料、合并症、跨大西洋腔内血管外科学会共识(TASC)II 分类、流出道和初始介入时的钙化程度(无、轻度、中度、重度)。记录两组患者的再次介入时间和复发模式。

结果

在研究期间,对 477 例患者的 746 次血管内介入治疗进行了分析。初次介入治疗后包括旁路、截肢和无症状闭塞在内的总再次介入率为 36.48%(SS 组为 42.9%,RS 组为 33.1%;P=0.04)。所有初始介入治疗中,共发现 165 例患者的 182 次股腘动脉再介入治疗(SS 组 70 例,RS 组 95 例)。两组间性别、合并症、初始 TASC II 分类、流出道评分、他汀类药物或氯吡格雷的使用或两者均无差异。RS 组和 SS 组的复发时间无差异。两组间 TASC II 分类、流出道评分和钙化程度相似。虽然无统计学意义,但对复发模式的分析表明,新发狭窄在 SS 组更为常见(50.0% vs 34.7%;P=0.06)。

结论

本单中心回顾性研究发现,选择性和常规支架置入治疗股腘动脉疾病患者的再介入治疗发生率存在显著差异。然而,对血管内再介入治疗的分析显示,两组之间的复发时间或复发模式无显著差异。两组的再介入终点的再发时间、TASC II 分类、流出道和钙化的血管内再介入无显著差异。需要开展更多的前瞻性研究,以评估常规和选择性支架置入在有症状的股腘周围动脉疾病中的作用,并探讨复发病变特征和这两组之间多次血管内介入治疗的通畅性。

相似文献

1
Patterns of femoropopliteal recurrence after routine and selective stenting endoluminal therapy.常规和选择性支架血管成形术腔内治疗后股浅动脉再狭窄的模式。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jan;57(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.06.097. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
2
Contemporary outcomes after superficial femoral artery angioplasty and stenting: the influence of TASC classification and runoff score.股浅动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后的当代疗效:TASC分类和血流分数的影响
J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):967-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.050. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
3
Comparison of Endovascular Versus Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal TASC II D Lesions: A Single-Center Study.股腘动脉TASC II D型病变的血管内治疗与旁路手术比较:一项单中心研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
4
Comparison of Atherectomy to Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting for Isolated Femoropopliteal Revascularization.斑块旋切术与球囊血管成形术及支架置入术用于孤立性股腘动脉血运重建的比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:261-273. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
5
Clinical significance of embolic events in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with or without embolic protection devices.在接受血管内股腘动脉介入治疗的患者中,有无栓塞保护装置的情况下栓塞事件的临床意义。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):359-367.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.119.
6
Incidence and the clinical impact of stent fractures after primary stenting for TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions at 1 year.一年后初次治疗 TASC C 和 D 型股腘动脉病变时支架断裂的发生率及其对临床的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;46(2):201-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
7
Primary stenting of the superficial femoral and popliteal artery.股浅动脉和腘动脉的初次支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Sep;50(3):542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.019. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
8
Safety, clinical outcome, and fracture rate of femoropopliteal stenting using a 4F compatible delivery system.使用4F兼容输送系统进行股腘动脉支架置入术的安全性、临床结局及骨折率
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
9
Management of isolated femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.孤立性股腘动脉支架内再狭窄的治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):807-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.030.
10
Outcomes of endovascular interventions for TASC II B and C femoropopliteal lesions.TASC II B和C型股腘动脉病变血管内介入治疗的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.059.

引用本文的文献

1
Current developments in endovascular therapy of peripheral vascular disease.外周血管疾病血管内治疗的当前进展
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1681-1694. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.130.
2
Predictors for Better Blood-Flow Restoration of Long-Segmental Below-the-Knee Chronic Total Occlusions after Endovascular Therapy in Diabetic Patients.糖尿病患者血管内治疗后长节段膝下慢性完全闭塞病变血流恢复较好的预测因素
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Nov-Dec;17(6):874-881. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.6.874. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Late outcomes of balloon angioplasty and angioplasty with selective stenting for superficial femoral-popliteal disease are equivalent.球囊血管成形术和选择性支架置入术治疗股浅动脉-腘动脉疾病的晚期结果相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1051-1057.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.283. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
2
Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial.镍钛诺支架植入与球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近段病变:RESILIENT 随机试验 12 个月结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun 1;3(3):267-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.903468. Epub 2010 May 18.
3
Duplex criteria for determination of in-stent stenosis after angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery.
用于确定股浅动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后支架内狭窄的双功超声标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):133-8; discussion 139. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.046.
4
Routine stent implantation vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.股腘动脉疾病中常规支架植入术与经皮腔内血管成形术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Eur Heart J. 2009 Jan;30(1):44-55. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn514. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
5
Outcomes of endovascular interventions for TASC II B and C femoropopliteal lesions.TASC II B和C型股腘动脉病变血管内介入治疗的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;48(3):627-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.059.
6
Cilostazol for peripheral arterial disease.西洛他唑用于治疗外周动脉疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD003748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003748.pub3.
7
Effects of a long-term exercise program on lower limb mobility, physiological responses, walking performance, and physical activity levels in patients with peripheral arterial disease.长期运动计划对周围动脉疾病患者下肢活动能力、生理反应、步行表现和身体活动水平的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):303-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.038.
8
Nitinol stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions up to 10 cm in length: the femoral artery stenting trial (FAST).镍钛诺支架植入术与经皮腔内血管成形术治疗长度达10厘米的股浅动脉病变:股动脉支架置入试验(FAST)
Circulation. 2007 Jul 17;116(3):285-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.689141. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
9
Epidemiology, classification, and modifiable risk factors of peripheral arterial disease.外周动脉疾病的流行病学、分类及可改变的危险因素
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(2):229-34. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2007.3.2.229.
10
The treatment of disabling intermittent claudication in patients with superficial femoral artery occlusive disease--decision analysis.股浅动脉闭塞性疾病患者致残性间歇性跛行的治疗——决策分析
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.044.