Gray Ronald H, Makumbi Fredrick, Serwadda David, Lutalo Tom, Nalugoda Fred, Opendi Pius, Kigozi Godfrey, Reynolds Steven J, Sewankambo Nelson K, Wawer Maria J
Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
BMJ. 2007 Jul 28;335(7612):188. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39210.582801.BE. Epub 2007 Jun 1.
To evaluate the limitations of rapid tests for HIV-1.
Diagnostic test accuracy study.
Rural Rakai, Uganda.
1517 males aged 15-49 screened for trials of circumcision for HIV prevention.
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values of an algorithm using three rapid tests for HIV, compared with the results of enzyme immunoassay and western blotting as the optimal methods.
Rapid test results were evaluated by enzyme immunoassay and western blotting. Sensitivity was 97.7%. Among 639 samples where the strength of positive bands was coded if the sample showed positivity for HIV, the algorithm had low specificity (94.1%) and a low positive predictive value (74.0%). Exclusion of 37 samples (5.8%) with a weak positive band improved the specificity (99.6%) and positive predictive value (97.7%).
Weak positive bands on rapid tests for HIV should be confirmed by enzyme immunoassay and western blotting before disclosing the diagnosis. Programmes using rapid tests routinely should use standard serological assays for quality control. Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT00425984.
评估人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)快速检测的局限性。
诊断试验准确性研究。
乌干达拉凯农村地区。
1517名年龄在15至49岁的男性,接受了预防HIV包皮环切术试验筛查。
将使用三种HIV快速检测的算法的灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值,与作为最佳方法的酶免疫测定和蛋白质印迹法的结果进行比较。
快速检测结果通过酶免疫测定和蛋白质印迹法进行评估。灵敏度为97.7%。在639个样本中,如果样本显示HIV阳性,则对阳性条带强度进行编码,该算法的特异性较低(94.1%),阳性预测值较低(74.0%)。排除37个(5.8%)弱阳性条带的样本后,特异性提高到99.6%,阳性预测值提高到97.7%。
在公布HIV快速检测诊断结果之前,应通过酶免疫测定和蛋白质印迹法确认弱阳性条带。常规使用快速检测的项目应使用标准血清学检测进行质量控制。试验注册 临床试验NCT00425984。