Suppr超能文献

疗养院比较质量衡量得分是否会随着时间推移因竞争而发生变化?

Have Nursing Home Compare quality measure scores changed over time in response to competition?

作者信息

Castle Nicholas G, Engberg John, Liu Darren

机构信息

Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):185-91. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016923.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services report on 15 Quality Measures (QMs) on the Nursing Home Compare (NHC) website. It is assumed that nursing homes are able to make improvements on these QMs, and in doing so they will attract more residents. In this investigation, we examine changes in QM scores, and whether competition and/or excess demand have influenced these change scores over a period of 1 year.

METHODS

Data come from NHC and the On-line Survey Certification And Recording (OSCAR) system. QM change scores are calculated using values from January 2003 to January 2004. A series of regression analyses are used to examine the association of competition and excess demand on QM scores.

RESULTS

Eight QMs show an average decrease in scores (ie, better quality) and six QMs show an average increase in scores (ie, worse quality). However, for 13 of the 14 QMs these average changes averaged less than 1%. The regression analyses show an association between higher competition and improving QM scores and an association between lower occupancy and improving QM scores.

CONCLUSION

As would be predicted based on the market-driven mechanism underlying quality improvements using report cards, we show that it is in the most competitive markets and those with the lowest average occupancy rates that improvements in the QM scores are more likely.

摘要

背景

目前,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心在养老院比较(NHC)网站上公布了15项质量指标(QM)。假定养老院能够在这些质量指标上有所改进,这样做就能吸引更多居民。在本调查中,我们研究了质量指标得分的变化情况,以及竞争和/或过度需求在1年时间里是否对这些变化得分产生了影响。

方法

数据来源于NHC和在线调查认证与记录(OSCAR)系统。质量指标变化得分是根据2003年1月至2004年1月的值计算得出的。采用一系列回归分析来研究竞争和过度需求与质量指标得分之间的关联。

结果

八项质量指标得分平均下降(即质量提高),六项质量指标得分平均上升(即质量下降)。然而,在14项质量指标中的13项,这些平均变化幅度均小于1%。回归分析表明,竞争加剧与质量指标得分提高之间存在关联,入住率降低与质量指标得分提高之间也存在关联。

结论

正如基于使用成绩单进行质量改进的市场驱动机制所预测的那样,我们发现,在竞争最激烈的市场以及平均入住率最低的市场中,质量指标得分更有可能提高。

相似文献

7
Market competition and the quality of nursing home care.市场竞争与养老院护理质量。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1994 Fall;19(3):555-82. doi: 10.1215/03616878-19-3-555.
8
Ratings game: an analysis of Nursing Home Compare and Yelp ratings.评级游戏:对养老院比较和 Yelp 评级的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):619-624. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007301. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

5
The Role of Severe Dementia in Nursing Home Report Cards.重度痴呆在疗养院成绩单中的作用。
Med Care Res Rev. 2015 Oct;72(5):562-79. doi: 10.1177/1077558715588436. Epub 2015 May 27.
7
The impact of competition on quality and prices in the English care homes market.竞争对英国养老院市场质量和价格的影响。
J Health Econ. 2014 Mar;34(100):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
9
Nursing home price and quality responses to publicly reported quality information.养老院价格和质量对公开报告的质量信息的反应。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):86-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01306.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

3
Report cards and nursing homes.成绩单与养老院。
Gerontologist. 2005 Feb;45(1):48-67. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.1.48.
5
Nursing home closures and quality of care.养老院关闭与护理质量。
Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Feb;62(1):111-32. doi: 10.1177/1077558704271728.
6
The extent of quality improvement activities in nursing homes.养老院质量改进活动的程度。
Am J Med Qual. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):255-65. doi: 10.1177/106286060401900605.
10
A national survey of assisted living facilities.一项针对辅助生活设施的全国性调查。
Gerontologist. 2003 Dec;43(6):875-82. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.6.875.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验