• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.利用更完善的信息提升长期护理质量。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):333-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00405.x.
2
Defining and measuring quality outcomes in long-term care.长期护理中质量结果的定义与衡量。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Mar;8(3 Suppl 2):e129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.12.014.
3
Defining and measuring quality outcomes in long-term care.定义和衡量长期护理中的质量结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Oct;7(8):532-8; discussion 538-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2006.08.001.
4
Costs of quality management systems in long-term care organizations: an exploration.长期护理机构质量管理体系的成本:一项探索性研究。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2003 Apr-Jun;12(2):106-14. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200304000-00006.
5
Making the most of quality indicator information.充分利用质量指标信息。
Geriatr Nurs. 2000 Jul-Aug;21(4):206-9. doi: 10.1067/mgn.2000.109576.
6
Risk adjustment and public reporting on home health care.家庭医疗保健的风险调整与公开报告。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):77-94.
7
Outcomes measurement and quality improvement in long-term care.长期护理中的结果测量与质量改进。
J Healthc Qual. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1999.tb00960.x.
8
Is a public reporting approach appropriate for nursing home care?公开报告的方式适用于疗养院护理吗?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2006 Aug;31(4):773-810. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-003.
9
Benchmarking and quality in residential and nursing homes: lessons from the US.养老院和疗养院的基准评估与质量:来自美国的经验教训。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;18(3):258-66. doi: 10.1002/gps.821.
10
Benchmarking: the backbone of successful performance improvement.标杆管理:成功提升绩效的支柱。
Caring. 2002 Jul;21(7):16-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Institutional care in four Latin American countries: the importance of fostering public information and evaluation strategies.四个拉丁美洲国家的机构照料:促进公共信息和评估策略的重要性。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2024 Mar 8;48:e14. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2024.14. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-Term Care Resident Health and Quality of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synthesis Analysis of Canadian Institute for Health Information Data Tables.新冠疫情期间长期护理机构居民的健康与护理质量:加拿大卫生信息研究所数据表的综合分析
Health Serv Insights. 2023 May 18;16:11786329231174745. doi: 10.1177/11786329231174745. eCollection 2023.
3
Measuring Nursing Home Performance Using Administrative Data.利用行政数据衡量养老院绩效。
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Apr;80(2):187-204. doi: 10.1177/10775587221108247. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
4
Promoting Quality of Life and Safety in Assisted Living: A Survey of State Monitoring and Enforcement Agents.促进辅助生活的生活质量和安全:对州监测和执法人员的调查。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Oct;79(5):731-737. doi: 10.1177/10775587211053410. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Assessing Nursing Homes Quality Indicators' Between-Provider Variability and Reliability: A Cross-Sectional Study Using ICCs and Rankability.评估养老院质量指标的提供者间变异性和可靠性:使用 ICC 和可排序性的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 10;17(24):9249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249249.
6
The Development of a Crosswalk for Functional Measures in Postacute Medicare Claims.基于 Medicare 后急性期索赔数据的功能测量转换工具的研发
Phys Ther. 2020 Sep 28;100(10):1862-1871. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa117.
7
Decomposing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Nursing Home Quality of Life.解析养老院生活质量的种族和民族差异。
J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Sep;40(9):1051-1061. doi: 10.1177/0733464820946659. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Does Living in a Higher Proportion Minority Facility Improve Quality of Life for Racial/Ethnic Minority Residents in Nursing Homes?居住在少数族裔比例较高的养老院是否能提高养老院中少数族裔居民的生活质量?
Innov Aging. 2020 Jun 5;4(3):igaa014. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa014. eCollection 2020.
9
Consumer Response to Composite Ratings of Nursing Home Quality.消费者对养老院质量综合评级的反应。
Am J Health Econ. 2019 Spring;5(2):165-190. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00115. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Building Capacity in Long-Term Care: Supporting Homes to Provide Intravenous Therapy.提升长期护理能力:支持机构提供静脉治疗服务
Can Geriatr J. 2018 Dec 30;21(4):310-319. doi: 10.5770/cgj.21.327. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting nursing home quality in Rhode Island.罗德岛疗养院质量报告。
Med Health R I. 2005 Jun;88(6):186-7, 191.
2
The effect of provider-level ascertainment bias on profiling nursing homes.提供者层面的确诊偏倚对疗养院评估的影响。
Stat Med. 2005 Dec 15;24(23):3609-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.2215.
3
The employment of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in U.S. nursing homes.美国疗养院中执业护士和医师助理的聘用情况。
Gerontologist. 2005 Aug;45(4):486-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.4.486.
4
The quality of the quality indicator of pain derived from the minimum data set.源自最小数据集的疼痛质量指标的质量。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug;40(4):1197-216. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00400.x.
5
Discharge planning, nursing home placement, and the Internet.出院计划、疗养院安置与互联网。
Nurs Outlook. 2005 Mar-Apr;53(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.02.002.
6
Purchasing or providing nursing home care: can quality of care data provide guidance.购买或提供养老院护理服务:护理质量数据能提供指导吗?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53207.x.
7
Evaluating the performance and contribution of nurses to achieve an environment of safety.评估护士在营造安全环境方面的表现和贡献。
Nurs Adm Q. 2005 Jan-Mar;29(1):14-23. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200501000-00004.
8
Challenges in measuring nursing home and home health quality: lessons from the First National Healthcare Quality Report.衡量疗养院和家庭医疗质量面临的挑战:来自首份《国家医疗质量报告》的经验教训
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3 Suppl):I24-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503001-00005.
9
Pay for performance: an excellent idea that simply needs implementation.按绩效付费:一个只需付诸实施的绝妙想法。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2005 Jan-Mar;14(1):31-44. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200501000-00004.
10
Continuous quality improvement as an innovation: which nursing facilities adopt it?持续质量改进作为一项创新举措:哪些护理机构采用了它?
Gerontologist. 2005 Feb;45(1):68-77. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.1.68.

利用更完善的信息提升长期护理质量。

Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.

作者信息

Mor Vincent

机构信息

Department of Community Health and Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Medicine, Box G-A418, Providence, RI 02192, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):333-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00405.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00405.x
PMID:16201996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2690144/
Abstract

Publicly reporting information stimulates providers' efforts to improve the quality of health care. The availability of mandated, uniform clinical data in all nursing homes and home health agencies has facilitated the public reporting of comparative quality data. This article reviews the conceptual and technical challenges of applying information about the quality of long-term care providers and the evidence for the impact of information-based quality improvement. Quality "tools" have been used despite questions about the validity of the measures and their use in selecting providers or offering them bonus payments. Although the industry now realizes the importance of quality, research still is needed on how consumers use this information to select providers and monitor their performance and whether these efforts actually improve the outcomes of care.

摘要

公开报告信息会促使医疗服务提供者努力提高医疗质量。所有疗养院和家庭健康机构都有法定的统一临床数据,这便于公开报告比较性质量数据。本文回顾了应用长期护理服务提供者质量信息的概念和技术挑战,以及基于信息的质量改进所产生影响的证据。尽管对这些措施的有效性以及它们在选择服务提供者或给予其奖金支付方面的用途存在疑问,但质量“工具”仍被使用。尽管该行业现在已经认识到质量的重要性,但仍需研究消费者如何利用这些信息来选择服务提供者并监督其表现,以及这些努力是否真的能改善护理结果。