• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者使用互联网技术在出现问题时进行报告。

Patients use an internet technology to report when things go wrong.

作者信息

Wasson John H, MacKenzie Todd A, Hall Michael

机构信息

Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):213-5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019810.

DOI:10.1136/qshc.2006.019810
PMID:17545349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2465004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As patients directly experience harm from adverse events, investigators have proposed patient-report to complement professional reporting of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how an automated health assessment system can be used to identify adverse events.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Internet survey responses from April 2003 to April 2005 involving communities and clinical practices across the USA.

PATIENTS

44,860 adults aged 19-69 years.

OUTCOME

Patient perceptions of adverse events experienced during the previous year. Independent legal review was also used to estimate how many patient-reports were serious enough to be potentially compensable.

RESULTS

Although patient reports of possible adverse events was low (1.4%), the percentage of adverse events was eight times higher for patients with the greatest burden of illness than for those with the least (3.4% vs 0.4%). Two expert malpractice attorneys agreed that 9% of the adverse events seemed to be serious.

CONCLUSIONS

PATIENTS will use internet technology to report their perceptions of health-related adverse events. Some of the patient-reported events reported will be serious.

摘要

背景

由于患者会直接遭受不良事件的伤害,研究人员提议采用患者报告来补充专业人员对不良事件的报告。

目的

探讨如何利用自动化健康评估系统来识别不良事件。

设计与背景

2003年4月至2005年4月期间对美国各地社区和临床机构进行的互联网调查回复。

患者

44860名年龄在19至69岁之间的成年人。

结果

患者对前一年经历的不良事件的认知。还通过独立的法律审查来估计有多少患者报告严重到可能获得赔偿。

结果

尽管患者报告的可能不良事件发生率较低(1.4%),但疾病负担最重的患者的不良事件发生率比负担最轻的患者高出八倍(3.4%对0.4%)。两名专业医疗事故律师一致认为,9%的不良事件似乎较为严重。

结论

患者会使用互联网技术报告他们对与健康相关不良事件的认知。一些患者报告的事件会很严重。

相似文献

1
Patients use an internet technology to report when things go wrong.患者使用互联网技术在出现问题时进行报告。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):213-5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019810.
2
Patients' identification and reporting of unsafe events at six hospitals in Japan.日本六家医院患者对不安全事件的识别与报告。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Nov;37(11):502-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37064-x.
3
What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.住院患者能就不良事件告诉我们什么?从患者报告的事件中学习。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):830-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0180.x.
4
Disclosing errors and adverse events in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的错误与不良事件披露
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1532-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215109.91452.A3.
5
Rates and types of events reported to established incident reporting systems in two US hospitals.向美国两家医院的既定事件报告系统报告的事件发生率及类型。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):164-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019901.
6
Does error and adverse event reporting by physicians and nurses differ?医生和护士的错误及不良事件报告有差异吗?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Sep;34(9):537-45. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34068-9.
7
Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database.从风险管理数据库中识别出的初级保健中的不良事件。
J Fam Pract. 1997 Jul;45(1):40-6.
8
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
9
Differences in the reporting of care-related patient injuries to existing reporting systems.向现有报告系统报告与护理相关的患者伤害情况存在差异。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Sep;29(9):460-7. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29055-9.
10
Transparency When Things Go Wrong: Physician Attitudes About Reporting Medical Errors to Patients, Peers, and Institutions.出问题时的透明度:医生对于向患者、同行及机构报告医疗差错的态度
J Patient Saf. 2017 Dec;13(4):243-248. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000153.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized assessment, information, and networking technologies (SAINTs): lessons from three decades of development and testing.标准化评估、信息和网络技术(SAINTs):三十年来的开发和测试经验教训。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3145-3155. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02528-z. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Monitoring adverse social and medical events in public health trials: assessing predictors and interpretation against a proposed model of adverse event reporting.监测公共卫生试验中的不良社会和医疗事件:根据不良事件报告的拟议模型评估预测因素和解释。
Trials. 2019 Dec 30;20(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3961-8.
3
Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction.患者门户在住院癌症患者中的采用和使用:对不良事件、利用和患者满意度影响的回顾性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4.
4
Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.从患者角度看临床医生审查下初级保健中潜在有害可预防问题的频率和性质:英国的一项基于人群的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 13;8(6):e020952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952.
5
Development and piloting of a survey to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a UK patient's perspective.从英国患者的角度出发,开展并试行一项调查,以估计初级医疗中潜在有害可预防问题的发生率和性质。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e017786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017786.
6
Patients' views of adverse events in primary and ambulatory care: a systematic review to assess methods and the content of what patients consider to be adverse events.患者对基层医疗和门诊医疗中不良事件的看法:一项评估方法及患者所认为不良事件内容的系统综述
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jan 27;17:6. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0408-0.
7
A World Wide Web-based survey of nonmedical tattooing in the United States.一项基于万维网的美国非医学纹身调查。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Jan;66(1):e13-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.038.
8
Baseline characteristics and patient reported outcome data of patients prescribed etanercept: web-based and telephone evaluation.接受依那西普治疗的患者的基线特征和患者报告结局数据:基于网络和电话评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jun 14;11:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-91.
9
Hospitalized patients' participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety.住院患者的参与及其对医疗质量和患者安全的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Jun;23(3):269-77. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr002. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
10
"Against the silence": development and first results of a patient survey to assess experiences of safety-related events in hospital.“打破沉默”:一项旨在评估医院安全相关事件经历的患者调查的开展及初步结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 20;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-59.

本文引用的文献

1
A controlled trial of methods for managing pain in primary care patients with or without co-occurring psychosocial problems.一项针对有或没有并发心理社会问题的初级保健患者疼痛管理方法的对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;4(4):341-50. doi: 10.1370/afm.527.
2
Patients report positive impacts of collaborative care.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2006 Jul-Sep;29(3):199-206. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200607000-00004.
3
Voluntary electronic reporting of medical errors and adverse events. An analysis of 92,547 reports from 26 acute care hospitals.医疗差错和不良事件的自愿电子报告。对26家急症医院的92547份报告的分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):165-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00322.x. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
4
Patient reports of undesirable events during hospitalization.患者关于住院期间不良事件的报告。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Oct;20(10):922-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0225.x.
5
What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.住院患者能就不良事件告诉我们什么?从患者报告的事件中学习。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):830-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0180.x.
6
Patients' safety.患者安全。
BMJ. 2005 Mar 12;330(7491):553-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.553.
7
Patient concerns about medical errors in emergency departments.患者对急诊科医疗差错的担忧。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):57-64. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.052.
8
Technology for community health alliances.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2004 Oct-Dec;27(4):366-74. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200410000-00009.
9
A community survey of medical errors in New York.纽约医疗差错的社区调查。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Oct;16(5):353-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh063.
10
Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care.患者对初级卫生保健中可预防问题及伤害的报告。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;2(4):333-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.220.