• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从英国患者的角度出发,开展并试行一项调查,以估计初级医疗中潜在有害可预防问题的发生率和性质。

Development and piloting of a survey to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a UK patient's perspective.

作者信息

Stocks Susan J, Donnelly Ailsa, Esmail Aneez, Beresford Joanne, Gamble Carolyn, Luty Sarah, Deacon Richard, Danczak Avril, Mann Nicola, Townsend David, Ashley James, Bowie Paul, Campbell Stephen M

机构信息

NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Research User Group (RUG) of the NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care,Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e017786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017786.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017786
PMID:29431124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5829776/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To design and pilot a survey to be used at the population level to estimate the frequency of patient-perceived potentially harmful preventable problems occurring in UK primary care. To explore the nature of the problems, patient-suggested strategies for prevention and opinions of clinicians and the public regarding the potential for harm.

DESIGN

A survey was codesigned by three members of the public and one researcher and piloted through public and patient involvement and engagement networks.

SETTING

Self-selected sample of the UK population.

PARTICIPANTS

977 members of the public accessed the online survey during October and November 2015.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Respondent feedback about the ease of completion of the survey, quality of responses in terms of review by clinicians and members of the public, preliminary estimates of the frequency and nature of patient-perceived potentially harmful problems occurring in the last 12 months.

RESULTS

638 (65%) members of the public completed the survey and few respondents reported any difficulty in understanding or completing the survey. 132 (21%) respondents reported experiencing a potentially harmful preventable problem during the past 12 months and 108 (82%) of these respondents provided a description that was adequate for at least one clinician to form an opinion about the potentially harmful problem. Respondents were older than the UK generally, more likely to work or volunteer in the healthcare sector and tended to use primary care more frequently but their confidence and trust in their own general practitioner (GP) was similar to that of the UK population as measured by the annual English GP patient survey.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey was acceptable to patients and mostly provided data of sufficient quality for review by clinicians and members of the public. It is now ready to use at a population level to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a patient's perspective.

摘要

目标

设计并试行一项用于人群层面的调查,以估算英国初级医疗中患者察觉到的潜在有害可预防问题的发生频率。探究这些问题的性质、患者提出的预防策略,以及临床医生和公众对潜在危害可能性的看法。

设计

由三名公众成员和一名研究人员共同设计该调查,并通过公众和患者参与及互动网络进行试行。

背景

英国人群的自我选择样本。

参与者

977名公众成员在2015年10月和11月期间参与了在线调查。

主要结局指标

受访者对调查完成难易程度的反馈、临床医生和公众审核后的回答质量、对过去12个月中患者察觉到的潜在有害问题的频率和性质的初步估算。

结果

638名(65%)公众成员完成了调查,很少有受访者表示在理解或完成调查方面有任何困难。132名(21%)受访者报告在过去12个月中经历了潜在有害的可预防问题,其中108名(82%)受访者提供的描述足以让至少一名临床医生对潜在有害问题形成看法。受访者的年龄普遍比英国总体人群大,更有可能在医疗保健领域工作或做志愿者,并且更频繁地使用初级医疗,但根据年度英国全科医生患者调查衡量,他们对自己的全科医生(GP)的信心和信任与英国人群相似。

结论

该调查为患者所接受,并且大多提供了质量足以供临床医生和公众审核的数据。现在它已准备好在人群层面使用,以从患者角度估算初级医疗中潜在有害可预防问题的频率和性质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b0c/5829776/e043b0b9ad03/bmjopen-2017-017786f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b0c/5829776/27ff714f1551/bmjopen-2017-017786f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b0c/5829776/e043b0b9ad03/bmjopen-2017-017786f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b0c/5829776/27ff714f1551/bmjopen-2017-017786f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b0c/5829776/e043b0b9ad03/bmjopen-2017-017786f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and piloting of a survey to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a UK patient's perspective.从英国患者的角度出发,开展并试行一项调查,以估计初级医疗中潜在有害可预防问题的发生率和性质。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e017786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017786.
2
Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.从患者角度看临床医生审查下初级保健中潜在有害可预防问题的频率和性质:英国的一项基于人群的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 13;8(6):e020952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952.
3
Perceptions of preventable medical errors in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省对可预防医疗差错的认知。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Apr;20(2):115-22. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm067. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
4
Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Patient Nondisclosure of Medically Relevant Information to Clinicians.患者向临床医生隐瞒与医疗相关信息的流行率及相关因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e185293. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5293.
5
Changing experience of adverse medical events in the National Health Service: Comparison of two population surveys in 2001 and 2013.国家医疗服务体系中不良医疗事件体验的变化:2001 年和 2013 年两次人口调查的比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;195:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
6
Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.英国患者及公众对知情同意模式和电子健康记录知晓程度的态度。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Apr;84(4):237-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
7
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
8
Patient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study.患者体验及其与全科医疗组织因素的关联:国际多中心横断面QUALICOPC研究挪威部分的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1684-z.
9
The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.英国国民医疗服务体系中用于初级医疗保健的全科医生患者调查问卷——开发与心理测量学特征
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Aug 22;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-57.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
ASK ME!-Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey.在门诊护理中测量患者对患者安全的体验:一种混合模式调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259252. eCollection 2021.
2
Analysis of the third WHO Global Safety Challenge 'Medication Without Harm' patient-facing materials: exploratory descriptive study.世界卫生组织第三次全球安全挑战“安全用药”患者用材料分析:探索性描述性研究。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Nov;28(Suppl 2):e109-e114. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002434. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
3
Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying patient-centred recommendations for improving patient safety in General Practices in England: a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses using the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire.识别以患者为中心的建议,以提高英格兰普通实践中的患者安全:使用患者报告的初级保健安全体验和结果(PREOS-PC)问卷对自由文本回复进行的定性内容分析。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):961-972. doi: 10.1111/hex.12537. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
2
Patient safety incidents are common in primary care: A national prospective active incident reporting survey.患者安全事件在初级医疗保健中很常见:一项全国性前瞻性主动事件报告调查。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 14;12(2):e0165455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165455. eCollection 2017.
3
从患者角度看临床医生审查下初级保健中潜在有害可预防问题的频率和性质:英国的一项基于人群的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 13;8(6):e020952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952.
Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the "Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care" (PREOS-PC).初级保健中患者安全的测量:“初级保健患者报告的安全体验与结果”(PREOS-PC)的开发与验证
Ann Fam Med. 2016 May;14(3):253-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1935.
4
How safe is primary care? A systematic review.初级保健有多安全?一项系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):544-53. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004178. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
A patient-initiated voluntary online survey of adverse medical events: the perspective of 696 injured patients and families.一项由患者发起的关于不良医疗事件的自愿在线调查:696名受伤患者及其家属的观点。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):620-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003980. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
6
Application of a tool for the evaluation of public and patient involvement in research.一种用于评估公众和患者参与研究情况的工具的应用
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 13;5(3):e006390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006390.
7
Trust, temporality and systems: how do patients understand patient safety in primary care? A qualitative study.信任、时间性与系统:患者如何理解基层医疗中的患者安全?一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):253-63. doi: 10.1111/hex.12342. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
8
Measuring experiences and outcomes of patient safety in primary care: a systematic review of available instruments.衡量初级保健中患者安全的经验和结果:对现有工具的系统评价
Fam Pract. 2015 Feb;32(1):106-19. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu052. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Doctors are to blame for perceived medical adverse events. A cross sectional population study. The Tromsø Study.医生应为感知到的医疗不良事件负责。一项横断面人群研究。特罗姆瑟研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 5;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-46.
10
Patient perceptions of mistakes in ambulatory care.患者对门诊医疗中失误的认知。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13;170(16):1480-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.288.