• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国髋关节与膝关节外科医师学会成员在成人股骨头坏死治疗方面的当前做法。

Current practices of AAHKS members in the treatment of adult osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

作者信息

McGrory Brian J, York Sally C, Iorio Richard, Macaulay William, Pelker Richard R, Parsley Brian S, Teeny Steven M

机构信息

American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1194-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00302.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.F.00302
PMID:17545421
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is currently no standardized protocol for evaluating and treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults in the United States. We sought to understand current treatment practices of a group of surgeons who commonly treat this disease to determine if there was agreement on some aspects of care.

METHODS

We designed a two-staged mixed-mode (mailed and faxed) sixteen-question self-administered descriptive survey questionnaire to be sent to all 753 active members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS). The survey design was based on Dillman's survey research methodology, and the questionnaire included hypothetical clinical scenarios based on the Steinberg classification system. The responses elucidated the opinions and treatment preferences of high-volume arthroplasty surgeons who treat adult patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

RESULTS

Of the 753 active members of the AAHKS, 403 (54%) responded to the questionnaire. Total hip replacement was reported to be the most frequent intervention for treatment of postcollapse (Steinberg stage-IIIB, IVB, V, and VI) osteonecrosis; core decompression was reported to be the most commonly offered intervention for symptomatic, precollapse (Steinberg stage-IB and IIB) osteonecrosis. Less frequently offered treatments included nonoperative management, osteotomy, vascularized and non-vascularized bone-grafting, hemiarthroplasty, and arthrodesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The care of adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head varies among American orthopaedic surgeons specializing in hip and knee surgery. A consensus may evolve with a continued concerted effort on the part of interested surgeons, but it will require randomized, controlled, prospective studies of treatment of each stage of the disease and collaborative multicenter studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V.

摘要

背景

在美国,目前尚无用于评估和治疗成人股骨头坏死的标准化方案。我们试图了解一组经常治疗该疾病的外科医生的当前治疗方法,以确定在某些护理方面是否存在共识。

方法

我们设计了一份包含16个问题的两阶段混合模式(邮寄和传真)自填式描述性调查问卷,将其发送给美国髋膝关节外科医生协会(AAHKS)的所有753名活跃会员。该调查设计基于迪尔曼的调查研究方法,问卷包括基于斯坦伯格分类系统的假设临床场景。这些回答阐明了大量治疗成人股骨头坏死患者的关节置换外科医生的意见和治疗偏好。

结果

AAHKS的753名活跃会员中,403名(54%)回复了问卷。据报告,全髋关节置换是治疗塌陷后(斯坦伯格III B期、IV B期、V期和VI期)股骨头坏死最常用的干预措施;据报告,核心减压是有症状的塌陷前(斯坦伯格I B期和II B期)股骨头坏死最常采用的干预措施。较少采用的治疗方法包括非手术治疗、截骨术、带血管和不带血管的骨移植、半髋关节置换术和关节融合术。

结论

在美国,专门从事髋膝关节手术的骨科医生对成人股骨头坏死的治疗方法各不相同。感兴趣的外科医生持续共同努力可能会形成共识,但这需要对疾病各阶段的治疗进行随机、对照、前瞻性研究以及多中心合作研究。

证据水平

治疗性水平V。

相似文献

1
Current practices of AAHKS members in the treatment of adult osteonecrosis of the femoral head.美国髋关节与膝关节外科医师学会成员在成人股骨头坏死治疗方面的当前做法。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1194-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00302.
2
Current practice of BHS members in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults.英国骨科学会成员在成人股骨头坏死治疗方面的当前实践。
Hip Int. 2018 Jan;28(1):90-95. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000535.
3
Comparison of results of core decompression and intertrochanteric osteotomy for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head using Cox regression and survivorship analysis.使用Cox回归和生存分析比较股骨头非创伤性骨坏死的髓芯减压和转子间截骨术的结果
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Sep;16(6):790-4. doi: 10.1054/arth.2001.23580.
4
Femoral head osteonecrosis: why choose free vascularized fibula grafting.股骨头坏死:为何选择游离血管化腓骨移植术。
Microsurgery. 2011 Mar;31(3):223-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.20837. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
5
Physical therapy alone compared with core decompression and physical therapy for femoral head osteonecrosis in sickle cell disease. Results of a multicenter study at a mean of three years after treatment.镰状细胞病股骨头坏死单纯物理治疗与髓芯减压加物理治疗的比较。一项多中心研究在治疗后平均三年的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2573-82. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01454.
6
[The transitory bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip].[髋关节短暂性骨髓水肿综合征]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002 May-Jun;140(3):286-96. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32466.
7
Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head by free vascularized fibular grafting: an analysis of surgical outcome and patient health status.游离带血管腓骨移植治疗股骨头坏死:手术结果及患者健康状况分析
Can J Surg. 1999 Aug;42(4):274-83.
8
The natural history of asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病成年患者股骨头无症状性骨坏死的自然病史。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2565-72. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01455.
9
[MRI-controlled outcome after core decompression of the femur head in aseptic osteonecrosis and transient bone marrow edema].[MRI 控制下无菌性股骨头坏死和短暂性骨髓水肿患者股骨头减压术后的结果]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1998 Mar-Apr;136(2):138-46. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1051296.
10
Comparison of early results of vascularized and non-vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.带血管蒂与不带血管蒂腓骨移植治疗股骨头坏死的早期疗效比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(5):326-34. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2259.

引用本文的文献

1
A nomogram for predicting contralateral femoral head collapse after unilateral replacement of bilateral femoral head necrosis.预测双侧股骨头坏死单侧置换术后对侧股骨头塌陷的列线图。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5983. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88057-6.
2
Trends in avascular necrosis and related arthroplasties in hospitalized patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.系统性红斑狼疮和类风湿关节炎住院患者的缺血性坏死及相关关节成形术的趋势。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Jun;66:152444. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152444. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
3
Time elapsed from definitive diagnosis to surgery for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a nationwide observational study in Japan.
从股骨头坏死的明确诊断到手术的时间:日本的一项全国性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e082342. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082342.
4
Development of a risk-predicting score for hip preservation with bone grafting therapy for osteonecrosis.用于骨坏死保髋植骨治疗的风险预测评分系统的开发。
iScience. 2024 Feb 27;27(4):109332. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109332. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
5
Bone tissue engineering for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.用于治疗股骨头坏死的骨组织工程
Exploration (Beijing). 2023 Feb 28;3(2):20210105. doi: 10.1002/EXP.20210105. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Rare Bi-focal Presentation of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: Successful Targeted Treatment as per the Diamond Concept and Review of the Literature.股骨头缺血性坏死的罕见双焦点表现:根据钻石概念进行的成功靶向治疗及文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Mar 20;15(3):e36423. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36423. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Application of protective weight-bearing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies.保护性负重在股骨头坏死中的应用:一项对随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Nov 2;9:1000073. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1000073. eCollection 2022.
8
Osteoradionecrosis of the Hip, a Troublesome Complication of Radiation Therapy: Case Series and Systematic Review.髋部放射性骨坏死:放射治疗的一种棘手并发症——病例系列与系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 25;9:858929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.858929. eCollection 2022.
9
Efficacy of various core decompression techniques versus non-operative treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.各种核心减压技术与非手术治疗股骨头坏死的疗效比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 15;22(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04808-2.
10
The outcome of hyperbaric oxygen therapy versus core decompression in the non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Retrospective Cohort Study.高压氧疗法与股骨头髓芯减压术治疗非创伤性股骨头缺血性坏死的疗效比较:回顾性队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 30;62:450-454. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.084. eCollection 2021 Feb.