Takahara Masatoshi, Mura Nariyuki, Sasaki Junya, Harada Mikio, Ogino Toshihiko
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iida-Nish 2-2-2, Yamagata City 990-9585, Japan.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1205-14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00622.
Indications for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum have remained unclear. The aims of this study were to analyze the outcomes and to determine the most useful classification for the choice of treatment.
The cases of 106 patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum were studied retrospectively. At the time of the initial presentation, the mean age of the patients was 15.3 years. The capitellar growth plate was open in eighteen patients and closed in eighty-eight. Thirty-six patients were treated nonoperatively. Fifty-five patients underwent fragment removal alone, twelve underwent fragment fixation with a bone graft, and three underwent reconstruction of the articular surface with use of osteochondral plug grafts from the lateral femoral condyle. The mean follow-up period was 7.2 years. The outcomes in terms of pain in the elbow, return to sports, and radiographic findings were analyzed and compared.
An osteochondritis dissecans lesion with an open capitellar physis and a good range of elbow motion resulted in a good outcome. Continued elbow stress resulted in the worst outcome in terms of pain and radiographic findings. In patients with a closed capitellar physis, surgery provided significantly better results than elbow rest (p < 0.01). Fragment fixation or reconstruction provided significantly better results than fragment removal alone (p < 0.05). The results of removal alone were dependent on the size of the defect in the capitellum. The outcome in terms of pain was closely associated with sports activity and radiographic findings.
We believe that osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum can be classified as stable or unstable. Stable lesions that healed completely with elbow rest had all of the following findings at the time of the initial presentation: an open capitellar growth plate, localized flattening or radiolucency of the subchondral bone, and good elbow motion. Unstable lesions, for which surgery provided significantly better results, had one of the following findings: a capitellum with a closed growth plate, fragmentation, or restriction of elbow motion of > or =20 degrees . For large unstable lesions, fragment fixation or reconstruction of the articular surface leads to better results than simple excision.
Prognostic Level II.
肱骨小头剥脱性骨软骨炎的治疗指征仍不明确。本研究的目的是分析治疗结果,并确定对治疗选择最有用的分类方法。
对106例肱骨小头剥脱性骨软骨炎患者的病例进行回顾性研究。初次就诊时,患者的平均年龄为15.3岁。18例患者的肱骨小头生长板开放,88例闭合。36例患者接受非手术治疗。55例患者仅行碎片切除术,12例行带骨移植的碎片固定术,3例行取自外侧股骨髁的骨软骨栓移植重建关节面。平均随访期为7.2年。分析并比较了肘部疼痛、恢复运动及影像学检查结果等方面的情况。
肱骨小头生长板开放且肘部活动范围良好的剥脱性骨软骨炎病变,预后良好。持续的肘部应力在疼痛和影像学检查结果方面导致最差的预后。在肱骨小头生长板闭合的患者中,手术效果明显优于肘部制动(p < 0.01)。碎片固定或重建的效果明显优于单纯碎片切除术(p < 0.05)。单纯切除术的效果取决于肱骨小头缺损的大小。疼痛方面的结果与体育活动及影像学检查结果密切相关。
我们认为,肱骨小头剥脱性骨软骨炎可分为稳定型或不稳定型。通过肘部制动完全愈合的稳定病变在初次就诊时有以下所有表现:肱骨小头生长板开放、软骨下骨局限性扁平或透亮以及肘部活动良好。不稳定病变手术效果明显更好,有以下表现之一:肱骨小头生长板闭合、有碎片或肘部活动受限≥20度。对于大型不稳定病变,碎片固定或关节面重建比单纯切除效果更好。
预后II级。