Bowman Eric N, Lane Gabriel, Goldfarb Charles F, Smith Matthew V
Department of Orthopaedics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1215 21st Avenue South, 4200 Medical Center East, Nashville, TN, 37232-8774, USA.
Meharry Medical College, 1005 Dr. DB Todd Jr. Blvd, Nashville, TN, 37208, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 16;145(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05635-5.
Management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum is challenging. Historically, variability exists between surgeons in the evaluation, treatment, and return to sport criteria. The purpose of this study was to define the current trends regarding evaluation, nonoperative and surgical management, and return to sport criteria for capitellar OCD lesions among surgeons.
A 21-question cross-sectional survey was administered to 24 Orthopaedic surgeons specializing in elbow OCDs. The survey included questions concerning imaging, specific non-operative treatments trialed, indications for surgery for stable and unstable lesions, preferred surgical techniques, osteochondral autograft utilization, and factors determining return to sport.
Twenty-one surgeons responded (88%). The most common surgical indications for stable lesions were time (≥ 6 months, 68%) and mechanical symptoms (52%). Drilling (45%) and fragment fixation (35%) were most preferred. For unstable lesions, factors in order of importance for determining surgical procedure were lesion size, lateral wall integrity, location on capitellum, skeletal maturity, and sport. For small (< 1 cm), centralized lesions, 81% preferred debridement with microfracture. For large (> 1 cm), lateralized lesions, 52% preferred debridement and microfracture and 48% preferred osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT). OAT was considered for 80% of failed procedures, 47% with lateral wall involvement, and 27% > 1 cm. Return to sport after debridement was typically 2-3 months (52%), fragment fixation was 4 months (52%), and OAT was 4-6 months, while microfracture had wide variability (3-6 months). The factors in order of importance were lack of pain, time, then imaging. Two-thirds of surgeons wait longer to release overhead athletes or gymnasts.
There is significant variability in the management of capitellar OCD in athletes. Small, centralized lesions are likely to be treated with debridement and microfracture with faster return to sport. Treatment of large, lateral lesions remains variable. Regarding OAT procedures, perceived morbidity, reimbursement, and limited evidence dissuade use. There is no consensus on return to sport, though lack of pain and time were most important; overhead athletes and gymnasts are restricted longer from returning to sport. Level of Evidence Level 5, diagnostic, cross-sectional survey.
肱骨小头剥脱性骨软骨炎(OCD)病变的管理具有挑战性。从历史上看,外科医生在评估、治疗和恢复运动标准方面存在差异。本研究的目的是确定外科医生对肱骨小头OCD病变的评估、非手术和手术管理以及恢复运动标准的当前趋势。
对24名专门研究肘部OCD的骨科医生进行了一项包含21个问题的横断面调查。该调查包括有关影像学、尝试的特定非手术治疗、稳定和不稳定病变的手术指征、首选手术技术、骨软骨自体移植的使用以及决定恢复运动的因素等问题。
21名外科医生做出了回应(88%)。稳定病变最常见的手术指征是时间(≥6个月,68%)和机械症状(52%)。最常首选的是钻孔(45%)和碎片固定(35%)。对于不稳定病变,决定手术方式的重要性顺序因素为病变大小、外侧壁完整性、在肱骨小头上的位置、骨骼成熟度和运动项目。对于小(<1 cm)的、位于中央的病变,81%的医生首选清创联合微骨折。对于大(>1 cm)的、位于外侧的病变,52%的医生首选清创和微骨折,48%的医生首选骨软骨自体移植转移(OAT)。80%的失败手术考虑采用OAT,47%的外侧壁受累手术和27%的>1 cm手术考虑采用OAT。清创后恢复运动的时间通常为2 - 3个月(52%),碎片固定为4个月(52%),OAT为4 - 6个月,而微骨折的恢复时间差异较大(3 - 6个月)。重要性顺序因素为无疼痛、时间,然后是影像学检查。三分之二的外科医生会让从事过头运动的运动员或体操运动员等待更长时间才能恢复运动。
运动员肱骨小头OCD的管理存在显著差异。小的、位于中央的病变可能采用清创联合微骨折治疗,恢复运动更快。大的、位于外侧的病变治疗方法仍存在差异。关于OAT手术,感知到的发病率、报销问题和有限的证据阻碍了其使用。对于恢复运动没有共识,尽管无疼痛和时间是最重要的因素;从事过头运动的运动员和体操运动员恢复运动的限制时间更长。证据水平5级,诊断性横断面调查。